green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Garabedian v. INS
See DeLeon v. INS, 547 F.2d 142, 149 (2d Cir. 1976) (even though BIA did not discuss claim, its affirmance of decision of the IJ shows that it adequately considered claim where most of the IJ's decision was devoted to discussion of claim), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 (1977); Ramirez-Gonzalez v. INS, 695 F.2d 1208, 1213 (9th Cir. 1983) (even though BIA stated no reasons for its decision, the decision by the IJ which the BIA affirmed "supplies the reasons required by the regulation"). 4 Petitioner also claims that the BIA erred in failing to give adequate weight to evidence of his rehabilitation …
discussed
Cited "see"
Garabedian v. INS
See DeLeon v. INS, ___ ______ ___ 547 F.2d 142, 149 (2d Cir. 1976) (even though BIA did not discuss claim, its affirmance of decision of the IJ shows that it adequately considered claim where most of the IJ's decision was devoted to discussion of claim), cert. denied, ____ ______ 434 U.S. 841 (1977); Ramirez-Gonzalez v. INS, 695 F.2d 1208 , ________________ ___ -3- 1213 (9th Cir. 1983) (even though BIA stated no reasons for its decision, the decision by the IJ which the BIA affirmed "supplies the reasons required by the regulation").
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
(2×)
See Green v. State, 75 Wis. 2d 631, 643-44 , 250 N.W.2d 305, 311 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Yant
(2×)
See United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1977); United States v. Cameron, 464 F.2d 333 (3d Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see"
CONNELLY
See DeLeon v. INS, 547 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Malatesta
See United States v. Washington, 5 Cir. 1977, 550 F.2d 320 , Cert. denied, 1977, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 ; United States v. Lewis, 5 Cir. 1973, 485 F.2d 236 , Cert. denied, 1974, 415 U.S. 980 , 94 S.Ct. 1569 , 39 L.Ed.2d 876 ; United States v. Roberts, 5 Cir. 1973, 481 F.2d 892 . 39 There is no doubt that the witness pointed to appellant Lynch, thereby identifying him.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Malatesta
See United States v. Washington, 5 Cir. 1977, 550 F.2d 320 , cert. denied, 1977, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 ; United States v. Lewis, 5 Cir. 1973, 485 F.2d 236 , cert. denied, 1974, 415 U.S. 980 , 94 S.Ct. 1569 , 39 L.Ed.2d 876 ; United States v. Roberts, 5 Cir. 1973, 481 F.2d 892 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gennero Galtieri v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, John Matera v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections
(2×)
See United States v. Washington, 550 F.2d 320, 330 (5th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1977). 55 In summary, there are a number of distinctions between this case and the Brady line of cases.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald L. Richards
(2×)
See United States v. Cardall, 10 Cir., 550 F.2d 604, 605 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 137 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 , and United States v. Redmond, 10 Cir., 546 F.2d 1386 -1391, cert. denied 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1645 , 56 L.Ed.2d 83 , both cases involving the same trial judge.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen M. Stoddart
See United States v. Cardall, 10 Cir., 550 F.2d 604, 606 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 137 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105, 1977 ; United States v. Redmond, 10 Cir., 546 F.2d 1386, 1390-1391 , cert. applied for; and Whitlock v. United States, 10 Cir., 429 F.2d 942, 947 (all cases involving the same trial judge).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Hubert Cain, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277, 282 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James H. Cain, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277, 282 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James H. Cain, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277, 282 (5th -5- Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Feng Chen v. INS
For that reason, we _____ _________ henceforth refer to the findings and conclusions of the IJ, adopted by the Board, as if the Board had authored them in the first instance. 7 F.3d at 1382-83; Maashio v. INS, 45 F.3d 1235, 1238 (8th Cir. _______ ___ 1995); Gandarillas-Zambrana v. BIA, 44 F.3d 1251, 1255 (4th ____________________ ___ Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 49 (1995); Panrit v. INS, 19 F.3d _____ ______ ______ ___ 544, 546 (10th Cir. 1994); Arango-Aradondo v. INS, 13 F.3d 610 , _______________ ___ 613 (2d Cir. 1994); see also De Leon v. INS, 547 F.2d 142 , 149 ___ ____ _______ ___ (1st…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bing Feng Chen v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
On this basis, we join eight of our sister circuits in ruling that the Board need not write at length merely to repeat the IJ’s findings of fact and his reasons for denying the requested relief, but, rather, having given individualized consideration to a particular ease, may simply state that it affirms the IJ’s decision for the reasons set forth in that decision. 3 See Prado-Gonzalez v. INS, 75 F.3d 631, 632 (11th Cir.1996); Gomez-Mejia v. INS, 56 F.3d 700, 702 (5th Cir.1995); Urukov v. INS, 55 F.3d 222, 227-28 (7th Cir.1995); Alaelua, 45 F.3d at 1382-83 ; Maashio v. INS, 45 F.3d 1235, 12…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cook
See also United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277, 285 (5th Cir.) (“the trial court’s exercise of this discretion [in removing a seated juror] is not to be disturbed absent a showing of bias or prejudice to the defendant”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1977); United States v. Boyd, 767 F.Supp. 905, 907 (N.D.Ill.1991) (“[a] decision to replace a juror with an alternate is subject to an ‘ “abuse of discretion” ’ review standard, and will not be overturned ‘ “if the record shows some legitimate basis for [the] decision” ’ ”) (quoting United Sta…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Schoolcraft
See e.g., United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, Wallace v. United States, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See also United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277, 281 (5th Cir.) (coworker permitted to testify that defendant understood CETA regulations he was charged with violating), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1977); cf. United States v. Hoffner, 777 F.2d 1423, 1425 (10th Cir.1985) (“[CJourts have been very liberal in admitting witnesses’ testimony as to another’s state of mind if the witness has had a sufficient opportunity to observe the accused so as to draw a rational conclusion about the intent of the accused.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mary M.M. Hoffner, M.D.
See e.g., United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 138 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1977), where a fellow employee was allowed to testify that the defendant had knowledge of certain CETA regulations which he was charged with violating.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Esther Skelly v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See, e. g., DeLeon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 547 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 137 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1977) (Section 241(f) does not waive deportability under § 241(a)(5)); Escobar Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 526 F.2d 969 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 426 U.S. 938 , 96 S.Ct. 2655 , 49 L.Ed.2d 390 (1976) (Section 241(f) does not permit reopening of deportation proceedings when § 212(a)(20) is the basis for deportation.) The only apparent exception to this trend is the Third Circuit’s decision in Persaud v. Immigration and Nat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert McPartlin
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Cardall, 550 F.2d 604, 606 (10th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 , 98 S.Ct. 137 , 54 L.Ed.2d 105 (1978); Gordon v. United States, 438 F.2d 858 , 862-63 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 404 U.S. 828 , 92 S.Ct. 63 , 30 L.Ed.2d 56 (1971); United States v. Allen, 431 F.2d 712, 712-13 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Wilkins, 422 F.Supp. 1371 (E.D.Pa.1976), Aff'd sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Melnyczenko
v.
Hewitt, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Hewitt, Correctional Superintendent
No. 76-6682.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.