Coastal States Petrochemical Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 942 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Coastal States Petrochemical Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 942 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · "the precedential value of this court's decision . . . was substantially diminished by the action of the Supreme Court in taking the case for review on the merits, which did not come about only by reason of the intervention of mootness"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “the precedential value of this court’s decision . was substantially diminished by the action of the Supreme Court in taking the case for review on the merits, which did not come about only by reason of the intervention of mootness”
164 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 41 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. National Labor Relations Board (cadc, 1980-01-07) · Strongest negative: In Re Robert Oberkoetter (ca1, 1980-01-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
cited Cited "but see" In Re Robert Oberkoetter
1st Cir. · 1980 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Parson, 561 F.2d 671, 674 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978).
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the precedential value of this court's decision . . . was substantially diminished by the action of the supreme court in taking the case for review on the merits, which did not come about only by reason of the intervention of mootness
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Retail Store Employees Union v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the precedential value of this court's decision . was substantially diminished by the action of the supreme court in taking the case for review on the merits, which did not come about only by reason of the intervention of mootness
discussed Cited "see" Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Stephenson (In Re MJK Clearing, Inc.)
Bankr. D. Minn. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whiteside & Co. v. SEC, 557 F.2d 1118, 1121 (5th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978); Loss and Seligman, Securities Regulation, 3d Ed., Vol. VII, pp. 3169-3173.
discussed Cited "see" Jose Santos Espinoza v. Ivalee Henry, Warden
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821, 832 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 and 435 U.S. 953 (1978) (government may charge in conjunctive form a statute denounced disjunctively, and evidence supporting one of the charges will support guilty verdict)
discussed Cited "see" ca9 1995
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Tidwell, 559 F.2d 262, 266-67 (5th Cir.1977) (in action charging bank officers with unauthorized issuance of letter of credit and misapplication of funds, final judgment in mortgage foreclosure proceeding properly excluded under Rule 403 because relevance outweighed by potential to confuse issues and to mislead jury), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Olano
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Tidwell, 559 F.2d 262, 266-67 (5th Cir.1977) (in action charging bank officers with unauthorized issuance of letter of credit and mis application of funds, final judgment in mortgage foreclosure proceeding properly excluded under Rule 403 because relevance outweighed by potential to confuse issues and to mislead jury), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Chen
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821, 827 (9th Cir.1977) (Abascal ), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 and 435 U.S. 953 , 98 S.Ct. 1583 , 55 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Chen
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821, 827 (9th Cir.1977) (Abascal), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 and 435 U.S. 953 , 98 S.Ct. 1583 , 55 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
D.C. Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See New York Stock Exchange, Inc. v. Bloom, 562 F.2d 736 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978) (holding opinion letter unreviewable).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Ingram
Colo. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821 (9th Cir.1977) cert. denied 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978); United States v. Cacace, 529 F.2d 1167 (5th Cir.) cert. denied 429 U.S. 841 , 97 S.Ct. 115 , 50 L.Ed.2d 109 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Donald Steffen
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Tidwell, 559 F.2d 262, 266 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978) (evidence that bank recovered its investment confused issue of intent to defraud); United States v. Johnson, 558 F.2d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1065 , 98 S.Ct. 1241 , 55 L.Ed.2d 766 (1978) (evidence of overpayment due to overlooked deductions confused issue of willfully falsifying tax returns).
cited Cited "see" Parke, Davis & Company v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
6th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Parke, Davis & Co. v. Califano, 564 F.2d 1200 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1522 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 (1978) (Parke Davis I).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jaye Wilson
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
If the district courts were not required to meet such a standard, their “supervisory power” could readily prove subversive of the doctrine of separation of powers. (footnotes omitted); accord, United States v. Hall, 559 F.2d 1160, 1164 (9 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Brigance
S.D. Tex. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hall, 559 F.2d 1160 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 (1978). 6 . 21 U.S.C. § 848 provides in relevant part as follows: (a)(1) Any person who engages in a continuing criminal enterprise shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 10 years and which may be up to life imprisonment, to a fine of not more than $100,000, and to the forfeiture prescribed in paragraph (2); except that if any person engages in such activity after one or more prior convictions of him under this section have become final, he sha…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ronald G. Lyman
9th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821, 832-33 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 953, 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 1583, 55 L.Ed.2d 538, 804 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Castillo-Garcia
D. Colo. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Compare United States v. Mondragon, 52 F.3d 291, 293 (10th Cir.1995) (requiring suppression of evidence, even though same judge had authorized all wiretaps, where a second “supplemental” wiretap application completely omitted any discussion of necessity requirement, either expressly or by referring to and incorporating prior affidavit) with United States v. Quintana, 70 F.3d 1167, 1170 (10th Cir.1995) (involving same investigation as Mondragon but allowing evidence obtained as result of a first “supplemental” wiretap application, where subject of investigation had changed telephone num…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Land Title Ass'n v. Clarke
W.D. Tex. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 152-53 , 87 S.Ct. at 1517-18 ; see also New York Stock Exchange v. Bloom, 562 F.2d 736, 741 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978) (referring to this choice as a “Hobson’s Choice”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Debbe Marquardt
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare 18 U.S.C. § 657 and United States v. Tidwell, 559 F.2d 262, 265 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978) (discussing elements of misapplication of bank funds pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 656 , a parallel provision of § 657 applying to national banks, members of the Federal Reserve banks, or banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation rather than savings and loan associations) with 18 U.S.C. § 1006 and United States v. Frederick, 551 F.Supp. 1035, 1042 (D.Kan.1982) (discussing elements of false entry pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1005 ,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Richard W. Suter
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hall, 559 F.2d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 (1978); United States v. Barger, 458 F.2d 396 (9th Cir.1972) (per curiam); United States v. Countryside Farms, Inc., 428 F.Supp. 1150, 1159 (D.Utah 1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Investment Co. Institute v. Conover
D.D.C. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, NYSE v. Smith, 404 F.Supp. 1091, 1097 (D.D.C. 1975), vacated on other grounds sub nom., NYSE v. Bloom, 562 F.2d 736 (D.C.Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Securities Industry Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and Bankamerica Corporation, Intervenor
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also New York Stock Exchange, Inc. v. Smith, 404 F.Supp. 1091, 1099-1100 (D.D.C.1975) (bank’s plan to purchase securities on account for customers, and automatically to deduct designated purchase amount from customers’ bank accounts, held to be consistent with the Act), vacated on other grounds, 562 F.2d 736 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. *99 denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Olea
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821, 827 (9th Cir.1977) (the standard of minimization is reasonableness), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Olea
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821, 827 (9th Cir.1977) (the standard of minimization is reasonableness), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Stephen A. Gonsalves
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hall, 559 F.2d 1160, 1165 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942, 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 (1978) (district court judge has no power to dismiss indictment on ground “it would be unconscionable to proceed further”); United States v. Real, 446 F.2d 40 (9th Cir.1971) (district court judge improperly dismissed indictment on ground of “merciful inclinations” toward defendant). 15 Such dismissals may easily constitute an example of the improper substitution of judicial discretion for prosecutorial discretion.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Golar v. Daniels & Bell, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. v. Bank of America, 385 F.Supp. 1084 (N.D.Cal.1974); see also, New York Stock Exchange v. Bloom, 562 F.2d 736, 742 (D.C.Cir.1977) (dicta), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. William Archie Williams
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Tidwell, 559 F.2d 262, 266 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1520 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978); United States v. Riley, 550 F.2d 233, 236 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Sorensen, 330 F.Supp. 642 (D.Mont.1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." ca2 1979
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Parsons, 561 F.2d 671 (7 Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978) with In re Grand Jury Proceedings Concerning Jaskiewicz, 362 F.2d 942 (3 Cir. 1966) The Commission might be able to make a better case for appealability if, when Dr. Powers is called, the Exchange should seek to press the questions to which the Commission objects and Dr. Powers should indicate unwillingness to follow the instructions of Commission counsel, but see note 9 Infra.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Super Spuds, Inc. v. New York Mercantile Exchange
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Parsons, 561 F.2d 671 (7 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 1521 , 55 L.Ed.2d 538 (1978) with In re Grand Jury Proceedings Concerning Jaskiewicz, 362 F.2d 942 (3 Cir. 1966).
Coastal States Petrochemical Co.
v.
United States
No. 77-936.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 27, 1978.
435 U.S. 942
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.