green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Edward B.
See State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542, 557 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hill
Although we previously followed Jones in applying the automatic standing rule to claims under the federal constitution; see State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Alice Paulette Pagan v. Shoney's, Inc.
See Valley View Cattle Co. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 548 F.2d 1219 , 1220 n. 2 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Taylor
See State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542, 559 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Ashley
See United States v. Landmesser, 553 F.2d 17, 20 (6th Cir.1977) (prior experience of agents relevant in determining whether other investigative procedures unlikely to succeed), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); United States v. Rodriguez, 606 F.Supp. 1363, 1368 (D.Mass.1985) (same); cf. United States v. Hoffman, 832 F.2d at 1306 (court may weigh experience of agents in balance in assessing probable cause for issuance of wiretap).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Higgins
See State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542, 560 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey
See United States v. Landmesser, 553 F.2d 17, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); United States v. Anderson, 542 F.2d 428, 431 (7th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
See Valley View Cattle Co. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 548 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); Spurlin v. General Motors Corp., 528 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1976); Urti v. Transport Commercial Corp., 479 F.2d 766 (5th Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company
See Valley View Cattle Co. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 548 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); Spurlin v. General Motors Corp., 528 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1976); Urti v. Transport Commercial Corp., 479 F.2d 766 (5th Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salvatore A. Williams, A/K/A \Sonny.\" United States of America v. Salvatore C. Williams
Furthermore, in determining whether this requirement has been satisfied, a court "may properly take into account affirmations which are founded in part upon the experience of specially trained agents." United States v. Ashley, 876 F.2d 1069, 1072 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Landmesser, 553 F.2d 17, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
Furthermore, in determining whether this requirement has been satisfied, a court “may properly take into account affirmations which are founded in part upon the experience of specially trained agents.” United States v. Ashley, 876 F.2d 1069, 1072 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Landmesser, 553 F.2d 17, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriquez
See also State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542 , 375 A.2d 1014 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); Berryhill v. Ricketts, 242 Ga. 447, 448-49 , 249 S.E.2d 197, 199 (1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 2418 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1979) (if a defendant gives a statement after being informed of the appointed attorney’s existence, the statements will be admissible because of the waiver); People v. Cozzi, 93 Ill.App.3d 94 , 48 Ill.Dec. 670 , 416 N.E.2d 1192 (1981) (when a defendant understands his rights and chooses to speak, not requesting his lawyer, such a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Derrico
State v. Moscone, 171 Conn. 500, 510 , 370 A.2d 1030 (1976); State v. Darwin, 161 Conn. 413, 428 , 288 A.2d 422 (1971), citing Miranda v. Arizona, supra; see also State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542, 551 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
v.
Valley View Cattle Co.
v.
Valley View Cattle Co.
No. 77-28.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.