green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
General Dynamics Corp. v. Sharp
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Not only is the disparity an order of magnitude smaller than in the two challenges the Supreme Court has sustained, but the Court has also upheld percentage disparities ranging between 14-93%. 12 See Container Corp., 463 U.S. at 174 n. 11, 175 n. 12, 184, 103 S.Ct. at 2944 n. 11, 2945 n. 12, 2950 (14%); Moorman, 437 U.S. at 271 , 98 S.Ct. at 2343 (25-40%); Underwood Typewriter v. Chamberlain, 254 U.S. 113, 119-120 , 41 S.Ct. 45, 46 , 65 L.Ed. 165 (1920) (93%).
discussed
Cited "see"
Green Party of Connecticut v. Garfield
(2×)
See Bang v. Chase, 442 F.Supp. 758 (D.Minn.1977), summarily aff'd sub nom., 436 U.S. 941 , 98 S.Ct. 2840 , 56 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick Rosenstiel Christopher Longley v. Carolyn Rodriguez, in Her Capacity as Chair of the Ethical Practices Board, or Her Successor
(2×)
See Bang v. Chase, 442 F.Supp. 758, 766 (D.Minn.1977) (three-judge court) (holding valid a Minnesota tax checkoff system for political party which tied amount of subsidy to measure of popular support), aff'd, 436 U.S. 941 , 98 S.Ct. 2840 , 56 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Day v. Hayes
See Bang v. Chase, 442 F.Supp. 758, 769-70 , including n. 33 (D.Minn.1977), aff'd, 436 U.S. 941 , 98 S.Ct. 2840 , 56 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
St. Louis Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local No. 73 v. City of St. Louis
See Hilligoss v. LaDow, 368 N.E.2d 1365, 1371 (Ind.App.1977) appeal dismissed 436 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 2840 , 56 L.Ed.2d 783 (1978). 5 The trial court arrived at the proper legal conclusion and its judgment is affirmed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pena
v.
Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
v.
Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
No. 77-1472.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 5, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 8th Sup. Jud. Dist., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, cer-tiorari denied.