Le Brun v. Cupp, 436 U.S. 959 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Le Brun v. Cupp, 436 U.S. 959 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[I]t is the rule of this Circuit that the Government must adhere strictly to the terms of the bargain it strikes with defendants.”
83 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 36 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ronald T. Pearce (ca3, 1986-06-12) · Strongest negative: United States v. James Norman, Jr. (ca9, 1995-09-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. James Norman, Jr.
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273, 1274-75 (3d Cir.1977) (distinguishing between government promise to take no position and promise to make no recommendation), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 (1978).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Ronald T. Pearce
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
t is the rule of this circuit that the government must adhere strictly to the terms of the bargain it strikes with defendants.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Thomas
N.M.C.C.A. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978); Military Rule of Evidence 901(b)(2).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lawrence Michael Duff
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840, 843 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3075 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1124 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Nathaniel A. Diamond
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273 (3d Cir.1977) (per cu- *107 riam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Joseph Corsentino
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978); but see id. at 1275 (Stern, J., dissenting).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Haley
E.D. Pa. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343 , 349 n. 10 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978) and United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brighter
Haw. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
As the State correctly points out, however, “the overwhelming weight of authority is that a fundamental condition of any suspended sentence or probation, whether ex pressly stated or not, is that the defendant shall not violate the law.” State v. Hotter, 340 N.W.2d 691, 693 (S.D.1983); see also, e.g., United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840, 843-44 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3075 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1124 (1978); United States v. Cardenas-Yanez, 741 F.Supp. 212, 214 (S.D.Fla.1990); State v. Hancock, 111 Idaho 835 , 727 P.2d 1263, 1266 (App.1986); Wilcox v. State, 395 So.2d 1…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Budgett
N.H. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
As the State correctly points out, however, “the overwhelming weight of authority is that a fundamental condition of any suspended sentence or probation, whether expressly stated or not, is that the defendant shall not violate the law.” State v. Holter, 340 N.W.2d 691, 693 (S.D. 1983); see also, e.g., United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840, 843-44 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 (1978); United States v. Cardenas-Yanez, 741 F. Supp. 212, 214 (S.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jacques
Utah Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343, 348 (5th Cir.) (affirming trial court’s exclusion of nonexpert’s opinion concerning signature on a receipt when nonexpert made “one-shot” comparison with a genuine signature for purposes of pending criminal investigation), cer t. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kunkel
N.D. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3075 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1124 (1978); State v. Holter, 340 N.W.2d 691 (S.D.1983); Jaynes v. State, 437 N.E.2d 137 (Ind.App.1982); Wilcox v. State, 395 So.2d 1054 (Ala.1981); State v. Austin, 295 N.W.2d 246 (Minn.1980); Commonwealth v. Mallon, 267 Pa.Super. 163 , 406 A.2d 569 (1979); State v. McGinnis, 243 N.W.2d 583 (Iowa 1976).
Le Brun
v.
Cupp, Penitentiary Superintendent
No. 77-6390.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1978.
436 U.S. 959
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.