green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
“parole is an interest within the scope of the 'liberty' protected by the due process clause ... in regard to prisoners already released on parole and facing possible revocation”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Klos v. Haskell
parole is an interest within the scope of the 'liberty' protected by the due process clause ... in regard to prisoners already released on parole and facing possible revocation
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Monarch Funding Corp.
See Gelb, 798 F.2d at 45 n. 6 (noting that Halpern was limited to its facts by subsequent decisions, including Winters v. Lavine, 574 F.2d 46, 47 (2d Cir.1978), and Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1154 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977)). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Burgos v. Hopkins
See Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1154 (2d Cir.) (stating that “mere fact that the remedy sought in one action is different from that sought in another does not alone suffice to differentiate the underlying claims,” in situation where court deciding initial proceeding had power to award relief sought in later proceeding), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burgos v. Hopkins
See Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1154 (2d Cir.) (stating that "mere fact that the remedy sought in one action is different from that sought in another does not alone suffice to differentiate the underlying claims," in situation where court deciding initial proceeding had power to award relief sought in later proceeding), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodziewicz v. Beyer
See Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rick Dean Bressman v. Hal Farrier, George Goff v. Crispus Nix Harold Farrier Deputy Warden Henry Correctional Officer Spangler Correctional Officer Rooney Correctional Officer Marshall Correctional Officer Severin Correctional Officer Drummond Correctional Officer Stevens Correctional Officer Fields Correctional Officer Dilks, George Goff v. Steve Dailey, Superintendent of Clarinda Correctional Officer Huskins, Laurence Burgin v. Hal Farrier Paul Grossheim Crispus Nix Ron Welder Charles Harper Marion Ware John Sanders Randall Martain R.W. McVeigh John Lewis A.K. Anderson Richard McAllon Neal Breding Captain Bridle J.R. Goetz Gerald Dolf George Finn Lt. Mitchell Paul Schrock John Dewey Richard Larkin George Clymax Rick Barlow Donell Prough Lt. Birdsell Steve Young Kevin Selton Lt. Barnard Lt. Crowell James Rennea Ray Olson Pat McLaughlin Bob Washington, Ronald W. Brewer and James Whited, Jr. v. John Henry Sarah Coats James Burton (Captain), Ronald A. Mahers v. Crispus C. Nix Charles Harper Ken Wittry Ronald G. Welder Paul Grossheim, Charles O. Reese v. Hal Farrier C.C. Nix, Warden Hedgepeth John Henry Ron G. Welder Charles Harper, Chester Walton, Jr. v. Crispus C. Nix Charles Harper Lieutenant Ship Ronald G. Welder
Accord Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1151, 1153-54 (2d Cir.) (Friendly, J.), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977). 45 Second, the Supreme Court was reviewing a decision of this Court.
cited
Cited "see"
Bressman v. Farrier
Accord Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1151, 1153-54 (2d Cir.) (Friendly, J.), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United States
See Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1150-52 (2d Cir.) (request for new parole hearing held a remedy available outside habeas corpus), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977). 5 See also Parole Commission, 793 F.2d at 343 -44 & n. 48.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re KDI Corp.
See Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1154 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977); Moore, supra, para. 0.405[1], at p. 627; Restatement of the Law of Judgments § 43 (1942).
cited
Cited "see"
Morris v. Hoag
See, Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977); People ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eusebia Fernandez Etc. v. Honorable Jose Trias Monge Etc.
See Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1150-51 (2d Cir.), cert, dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977), (relief in form of new parole hearing not exclusively in habeas since release not certain consequence).
discussed
Cited "see"
Inmates Of The Nebraska Penal And Correctional Complex v. Greenholtz
See discussion, Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1157-58 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 . 22 The Board primarily relies on the companion cases of Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215 , 96 S.Ct. 2532 , 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976), and Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236 , 96 S.Ct. 2543 , 49 L.Ed.2d 466 (1976), for its contention that parole determinations do not implicate the Fourteenth Amendment.
cited
Cited "see"
Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex v. Greenholtz
See discussion, Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1157-58 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Magnus Electronics, Inc. v. La Republica Argentina
Winters v. Lavine, 574 F.2d 46, 67 (2d Cir.1978); see also Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1154 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977); 1B Moore’s ¶ 0.443[5.-2], at 791.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. Wolff
See, e.g., Williams v. Ward, 556 F.2d 1143, 1151 (2d Cir.) cert. dismissed 434 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 469 , 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Muss
v.
City of Miami Beach
v.
City of Miami Beach
No. 77-502.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (1)
Appeal from Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.