Heitland v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 434 U.S. 819 (1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Heitland v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 434 U.S. 819 (1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the significance of an absence will depend. upon the relevant factors and circumstances found in each case”
82 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 31 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dicola v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.) (nysb, 1992-12-10) · Strongest negative: Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. Meese (caed, 1988-05-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. Meese
E.D. Cal. · 1988 · signal: but see · confidence high
If that purpose was to accomplish some object which was itself contrary to a policy reflected in the immigration laws, the absence would be regarded as “meaningful.” Illegal entry or reentry into the United States, however, was not, without more, the type of unlawful conduct that would necessarily render an absence not innocent and therefore “meaningful.” See *1159 Git Foo Wong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 358 F.2d 151, 153-54 (9th Cir.1966); see also de Gallardo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 624 F.2d 85, 87 (9th Cir.1980) 10 ; but see Heitland v. Immigration…
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Dicola v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
champion
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Rodolfo Jubilado v. United States
9th Cir. · 1987 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the significance of an absence will depend. upon the relevant factors and circumstances found in each case
discussed Cited "see" Stonewall Insurance Co. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Del. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Champion Int’l Corp. v. Cont’l Casualty Co., 546 F.2d 502, 505-06 (2d Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S.Ct. 59 , 54 L.Ed.2d 75 (1977). 10 . 3 Alan S. Rutkin et al., New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide 39.15(4) (2009) ("[a] 'deemer' clause [] is a mechanism to determine which single policy responds where an occurrence potentially triggers more than one policy.... [t]he intent of these clauses is to limit the insurer’s liability where loss spreads over more than one policy period.... ”). 11 .
discussed Cited "see" Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Conn. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Champion International Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 546 F.2d 502, 508 (2d Cir. 1976) (Newman, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S. Ct. 59 , 54 L.
discussed Cited "see" Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.- “[T]he meaning of particular language found in insurance policies should be examined ‘in light of the business purposes sought to be achieved by the parties and the plain meaning of the words chosen by them to effect those purposes.’ ” Newmont Mines Ltd. v. Hanover Insurance Co., 784 F.2d 127, 135 (2d Cir.1986) (quoting Champion International Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 546 F.2d 502, 505 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S.Ct. 59 , 54 L.Ed.2d 75 (1977)).
discussed Cited "see" Great Northern Insurance v. Dayco Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Champion International Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 546 F.2d 502, 504 (2d Cir.1976) (defective paneling used by 26 different manufacturers constitutes one “occurrence”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S.Ct. 59 , 54 L.Ed.2d 75 (1977).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Sam B. Haynes
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. United States, 548 F.2d 249 (8 Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S.Ct. 59 , 54 L.Ed.2d 75 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barnett v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is well settled that" ‘section 2255 may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.’ ” Cabrera v. United States, 972 F.2d 23, 25 (2d Cir.1992) (quoting Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam,)); see also United States v. Natelli, 553 F.2d 5, 7 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (“once a matter has been decided adversely to a defendant on direct appeal it cannot be relitigated in a collateral attack under section 2255”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S.Ct. 59 , 54 L.Ed.2d 75 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Red Cross v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
D.D.C. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Champion Int'l Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 546 F.2d 502 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S.Ct. 59 , 54 L.Ed.2d 75 (1977) (sale of defective vinyl-covered paneling to 26 manufacturers one occurrence); Stonewall Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Heitland et ux.
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 76-1489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
434 U.S. 819
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1) · S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.