Matthews v. North Carolina, 439 U.S. 1128 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Matthews v. North Carolina, 439 U.S. 1128 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where a counterclaim seeks to assert a separate cause of action for an independent wrong, it generally may not be instituted after the applicable statute of limitations has expired.”
73 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 36 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Appelbaum v. Ceres Land Co. (mnd, 1981-02-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Appelbaum v. Ceres Land Co.
D. Minnesota · 1981 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
where a counterclaim seeks to assert a separate cause of action for an independent wrong, it generally may not be instituted after the applicable statute of limitations has expired.
cited Cited "see" Cordova v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya De Puerto Rico
D.P.R. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Basham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918, 927 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1978).
cited Cited "see" State v. Wilson
N.C. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Matthews, 295 N.C. 265, 289-90 , 245 S.E. 2d 727, 742 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 90 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Jasper County Savings Bank v. Gilbert
Iowa · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
Iowa Code § 554 .-9110 (1979); see Basham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918, 924 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied sub mm DeJaynes v. General Finance Corp. of Illinois, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979) (for purposes of section 1639(a)(8) extent of security interest determined by state law).
discussed Cited "see" Aetna Finance Co. v. Pasquali
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
Report 76 (1977); see Basham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); cf. Gillis v. Fisher Hardware Co., 289 So.2d 451 (Fla.App.1974) (a claim under the Act must be brought within one year); Shaw v. First National Bank, 143 Ga.App. 416 , 238 S.E.2d 719 (1977) (a claim under the Act must be brought within one year); Shannon v. Carter, 282 Or. 449 , 579 P.2d 1288 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1090 , 99 S.Ct. 873 , 59 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979) (a recoupment defense is not allowed unless it would be unfair or unjust to hol…
examined Cited "see" Olga Valencia and Miguel Gonzalez v. Anderson Bros. Ford and Ford Motor Credit Company (4×)
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Basham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918, 924 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); Tinsman v. Moline Beneficial Finance Co., 531 F.2d 815, 818 (7th Cir. 1976). 6 Close examination of Basham and Tinsman reveals, however, that this court looked to state law in those cases to determine the scope or extent of security interests clearly claimed by creditors, not to determine whether an unidentified interest was indeed a security interest.
discussed Cited "see" Jacklitch v. Redstone Federal Credit Union
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Basham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918 , 924 n. 9 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Jacklitch v. Redstone Federal Credit Union
Fed. Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Basham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918 , 924 n. 9 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Richard L. Smith and Deborah L. Smith v. No. 2 Galesburg Crown Finance Corporation
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Basham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918, 929 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979). *422 VIII Ten of the cases 38 involve one or more instances in which the district court refused to exercise pendent jurisdiction over claims arising under state law.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Christy v. Heights Finance Corp.
C.D. Ill. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Bas-ham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, DeJaynes v. General Finance Corp., 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979) and First National Bank v. Childs, 444 U.S. 825 , 100 S.Ct. 47 , 62 L.Ed.2d 32 (1979) (in determining whether the time barred Truth-In-Lending Act claim could still be brought by the debtors as a recoupment claim against the creditor, the court stated, “The TILA claim is not directed at or an answer to the underlying debt.” 583 F.2d at 928 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fred and Bonnie Besaw v. General Finance Corporation of Georgia
11th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Basham v. Finance America Corp., 583 F.2d 918, 926 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied sum nom., DeJaynes v. General Finance Corp., 439 U.S. 1128 , 99 S.Ct. 1046 , 59 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979) (key factors are reasonable proximity and comprehensibility); Lamar v. American Finance System, Inc., 577 F.2d 953 (5th Cir.1978) (regarding disclosure of security interest retained by lender, Board’s Public Position Letter No. 780 does not require any particular order so long as description is clear and conspicuous).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Matthews
v.
North Carolina
No. 78-813.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1979.
439 U.S. 1128
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: D. Minnesota (1)

Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.