green
Positive treatment
12.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Thompson v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
But cf the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Elizabeth Morgan, M.D. v. Eric A. Foretich Vincent Foretich Doris Foretich, Hilary Foretich, an Infant Who Sues Through Her Mother and Next Friend, Elizabeth Morgan, M.D. v. Eric A. Foretich Vincent Foretich Doris Foretich, Elizabeth Morgan, M.D. v. Eric A. Foretich Vincent Foretich Doris Foretich, Hilary Foretich, an Infant Who Sues Through Her Mother and Next Friend, Elizabeth Morgan, M.D. v. Eric A. Foretich Vincent Foretich Doris Foretich
But see, United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979) 7 Rule 601 of the Federal Rules of Evidence states that "[e]very person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these rules." However, since Hilary was never called as a witness, we are not directly faced with the issue of whether she would have been competent to testify at trial.
cited
Cited "but see"
Morgan v. Foretich
But see, United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979). .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cartwright
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S. Ct. 1244 , 59 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lucio Arturo Garcia-Flores
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (enbanc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pollani
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wynn v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909 (5th Cir.1978) ( en banc ) ("It is derogative of the search for truth to allow a defendant to tell his story of innocence without facing him with evidence impeaching that story."), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Misher
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Edward Brown
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) (stating that the first step in a Rule 404(b) analysis is to decide whether the challenged evidence was relevant to an issue other than character), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Finney v. State
Accord United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 , 915 n. 15 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mooney v. Aramco Services Co.
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909-18 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Robinson, 700 F.2d 205, 210 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1008 , 104 S.Ct. 1003 , 79 L.Ed.2d 235 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
68 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 421, 32 fed.r.serv.3d 994, 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 752 Robert R. Mooney v. Aramco Services Co., Arabian American Oil Co., James Elliott McMillan Raymond v. Aberle v. Aramco Services Co., Arabian American Oil Co., Thomas F. Kaus, Raymond v. Aberle v. Aramco Services Co., Arabian American Oil Co., Arthur G. Brunst, Raymond v. Aberle v. Arabian American Oil Co., Robert Olson, Raymond v. Aberle v. Arabian American Oil Co., John R. Richards, Raymond v. Aberle v. Arabian American Oil Co., William v. Ozolin, Kenneth O. Olson v. Arabian American Oil Co.
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909-18 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Robinson, 700 F.2d 205, 210 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1008 , 104 S.Ct. 1003 , 79 L.Ed.2d 235 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fernell Wilwright, Erskin Duskin and Michael Turner
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 910-11 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) (explaining that Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) requires first, a determination that the extrinsic offense evidence is relevant to an issue other than character, and second, that the evidence pass the requirements of rule 403), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Perrigo
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S. Ct. 1244 , 59 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Robichaux
See U.S. v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979) for a discussion of this two-step approach to admission of extrinsic evidence. 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis J. Murray
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 [, 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 ] (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marion Eugene Fair
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Greenwood
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Greenwood
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Judith Perez, Marjorie Conrade
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 907 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald Thigpen v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Willie D. Johnson, Warden, Holman Unit
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 902 n. 10 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979). 20 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeff Edward Fortenberry, Jr.
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
H & W Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Occidental Chemical Corp., Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909-18 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Robinson, 700 F.2d 205, 210 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1008 , 104 S.Ct. 1003 , 79 L.Ed.2d 235 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimmie Burden, Jr. v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
Although the extrinsic incident at issue in Lisenba did not result in a conviction or even in criminal charges, the Court sustained the state trial court’s admission of the evidence because of “the widely recognized principle that similar but disconnected acts may be shown to establish intent, design, and system.” Id., 62 S.Ct. at 286 ; see United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 910 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Miller, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 , 912 n. 15 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Buhl
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gamble
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 [ 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 ] (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tito Perez, Jr.
At trial's end, the court ruled that it would admit evidence of Perez' extrinsic marijuana offense under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b); see generally United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979), as substantive evidence of Perez’ intent in the instant cocaine offense.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Gene Henthorn and Tom D. Riley
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graves v. United States
These courts have perceived a sufficient foundation in defense counsel’s opening statement, United States v. Price, 617 F.2d 455, 459-60 (7th Cir.1979) (suggested alleged bribes were “gifts” or “contributions”), or in previous proceedings in the same case, United States v. Adderly, 529 F.2d 1178, 1182 (5th Cir.1976) (hung jury), or in the obviousness of intent, for example, as “the only real issue,” United States v. DeLoach, 210 U.S.App.D.C. 48, 54 , 654 F.2d 763, 769 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 1717 , 68 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); accord United States v. Beechum, 58…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Leon Dotson
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Merriweather
(2×)
See United States v. Brown, 608 F.2d 551, 555 (5th Cir.1979) (“extrinsic evidence may only be introduced if ‘an offense was in fact committed and the defendant in fact committed it.’ United States v. Beechum, [ 582 F.2d 898, 912 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979)]”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carolyn Lewis
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. DiZenzo, 500 F.2d 263, 265 (4th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse Byrd, Jr.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Salisbury, 662 F.2d 738 (11th Cir.1981) (following Beechum), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2907 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1316 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clyde Alvin Williford, Sr., Clyde Alvin Williford, Jr.
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jamieson
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alberto Montes-Cardenas, A/K/A Tony Campos
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson Tony Harrell, James Hawkins, Anthony Scire, Karl Heinz Harig
See generally United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 , 911 n. 15 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brannan
See Appendix 18, Analysis of Mil.R.Evid. 404(b), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition); see generally United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lloyd Taylor
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); Advisory Committee Note, Fed.R.Evid. 404(b).
cited
Cited "see"
The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Hirschell L. Guynes and Mable Ann Guynes
See generally United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 910-12 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Owens
See United States v. Beecham, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) cert, denied 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Woodyard
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.) (En Banc), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1978), which contains a thorough analysis of the similarity requirement and how it works with the probative value requirement, i.e., as similarity increases, so does probative value. .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Cauley
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909-18 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) (where defense is that defendant mailman intended to turn in money taken from the mail, court properly admitted evidence that he had in his possession credit cards stolen from the mail months earlier), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1335-37 (9th Cir.1977) (evidence of subsequent participation in robbery admissible to rebut defense of duress to bank robberjf charge), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 914-15 (5th Cir. 1978) (en bane), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luther Amos Beahm
(2×)
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911-16 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. DiZenzo, 500 F.2d 263, 265 (4 Cir. 1974); United States v. Mastrotaro, 455 F.2d 802, 803 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 967 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 666 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur John Kloock, III
See U. S. v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc) cert, denied 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis E. Guerrero, M.D.
See Fed.R.Ev. 404(b). 4 In United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979), this court rather exhaustively discussed the prerequisites to the admissibility of “extrinsic act” evidence under Rule 404(b).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawton Scott Mock
See United States v. McRae, 593 F.2d 700, 707 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 862 , 100 S.Ct. 128 , 62 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979), or for evidence adding only a minor “incremental probity,” United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 914 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swanson
v.
Califano, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
v.
Califano, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
No. 78-5755.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1979.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.