green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1988 ·
…he appointment by the state of a majority of an institution's board is either determinative of state action or an important factor in establishing state action.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Robert Janusaitis v. Middlebury Volunteer Fire Department
See, e. g., Weise v. Syracuse University, 522 F.2d 397, 406 (2d Cir. 1975); but cf. Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1 , 6 at n.5 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1979).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jones v. Duncan
he appointment by the state of a majority of an institution's board is either determinative of state action or an important factor in establishing state action.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jones v. Duncan
he appointment by the state of a majority of an institution's board is either determinative of state action or an important factor in establishing state action.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Joe Jackson
Our standard of review when the sufficiency of the evidence is questioned on appeal is "whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S. Ct. 278 1, 2789 (1979 ). 2 The appellan t did not testify nor did he o ffer any evidenc e on his behalf. 3 The identity of the accused as the person who committed the offense for which he is on trial is a ques tion of fact for the jury.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorothy J. v. Little Rock School District
See Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978); Conner v. Santa Ana, 897 F.2d 1487 , 1492 n. 9 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 59 , 112 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin
See Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978); Howerton v. Gabica, 708 F.2d 380 , 385 n. 10 (9th Cir.1983). 12 At the time of section 1983's enactment, the common law provided an action for the tort of malicious prosecution, which was used as a remedy for wrongful attachment.
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin
See Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978); Howerton v. Gabica, 708 F.2d 380 , 385 n. 10 (9th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
California ex rel. California Air Resources Board v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. EPA, 572 F.2d 1150 , 1163-64 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 256 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of California, Ex Rel. State of California Air Resources Board and California Resources Agency the California Department of Transportation: California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, an Agency of the United States, and Anne M. Gorsuch, in Her Capacity as Administrator, Etc., Department of Conservation & Natural Resources of the State of Nevada, Respondent-Intervenor. League to Save Lake Tahoe, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, an Agency of the United States, and Anne M. Gorsuch, in Her Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Nevada, Ex Rel. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, an Agency of the United States and William H. Ruckelshaus, in His Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of California, Ex Rel. John K. Van De Kamp, in His Capacity as State Attorney General, and League to Save Lake Tahoe, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, an Agency of the United States and William D. Ruckelshaus, in His Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Nevada, Respondent-Intervenor
See Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. EPA, 572 F.2d 1150 , 1163-64 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 256 (1978). 27 Nevada next contends that California's SIP does not provide for attainment as expeditiously as possible because it does not include some of the measures adopted by the California Air Resources Board and which were included in an earlier implementation plan.
cited
Cited "see"
Air Pollution Control District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. EPA, 572 F.2d 1150 , 1160 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 256 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Air Pollution Control District Of Jefferson County, Kentucky v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. EPA, 572 F.2d 1150 , 1160 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 256 (1978) 7 The criteria are as follows: (1) a demonstration establishing the existence and geographic boundaries of the nonattainment or PSD area which is the subject of the petition; (2) a demonstration that achievement of ambient air quality standards, or of measures necessary to prevent significant deterioration or to protect visibility, is prevented by the named out-of-state sources; and (3) indications that sources within the petitioning states which im…
cited
Cited "see"
Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. EPA, 572 F.2d 1150 , 1164 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Costle
See Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. EPA, 572 F.2d 1150 , 1164 (6th Cir.1978), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul E. Sherman v. Four County Counseling Center, Douglas Cox, Cass Superior Court Judge, and Gary Boyles, Officer
See, e.g., Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1, 15-16 (1st Cir.) (spendthrift guardian who had ward sterilized against her will not entitled to qualified immunity), cert. denied sub nom., Hogan v. Downs, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978); Howerton, 708 F.2d at 385 n. 10 (9th Cir.1983); Duncan, 844 F.2d at 1261 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Katherine Crippa, Etc. v. Michael S. Dukakis, Etc., Appeal of Craig Fox, Etc.
See also Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1, 14 (1st Cir.) (“[I]n the absence of any factual development as to the nature of the [social worker] positions involved and the range of responsibilities committed to these defendants, it would be inappropriate at this point for this court to attempt to answer ... [the] crucial question [whether defendants are protected by qualified immunity.]”), cer t. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 87-2817
Compare Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1, 15-16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978) (private parties not entitled to immunity) with Buller v. Buechler, 706 F.2d 844 , 850-53 (8th Cir.1983) (immunity attaches to private parties); Folsom Investment Co. v. Moore, 681 F.2d 1032, 1037-38 (5th Cir. Unit A 1982) (same); Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 851 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc) (same) 5 Kennerly v. United States, 721 F.2d 1252, 1259 (9th Cir.1983) is not to the contrary.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
F.E. Trotter, Inc. v. Watkins
Compare Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1, 15-16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978) (private parties not entitled to immunity) with Buller v. Buechler, 706 F.2d 844 , 850-53 (8th Cir.1983) (immunity attaches to private parties); Folsom Investment Co. v. Moore, 681 F.2d 1032, 1037-38 (5th Cir. Unit A 1982) (same); Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 851 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc) (same). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. Hooks
Elam, 573 F.Supp. at 805 ; see also Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1 , 16 & n. 19 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. Hooks
Elam, 573 F.Supp. at 805 ; see also Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1 , 16 & n. 19 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dressman v. Costle
See also Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. EPA, 572 F.2d 1150 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 256 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dressman v. Costle
See also Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. EPA, 572 F.2d 1150 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 256 (1978). 25 In their petition for review, the Judge-Executives contend that the Administrator's September 22, 1980, rulemaking was unconstitutional because it violated the tenth amendment and deprived the counties of valuable property rights without due process.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett L. Crowder, II v. J.K. Conlan
See also Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978) (appointment of entire Board of Directors of hospital by public officials and distribution of hospital’s profits to town support finding of “state action”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
J.D. Franks and Margaret Franks v. Van Smith, Etc.
See, e.g., Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 278 , 58 L.Ed.2d 256 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hazel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-6876.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.