green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Aichele
(2×)
See United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1247 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry E. Claiborne
See United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242 , 1249 n. 10 (9th Cir.1978) (characterizing a request for everything tending to impeach the credibility of an identified witness as a general request) cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979); Ostrer v. United States, 577 F.2d 782, 786 (2d Cir. 1978) (characterizing a request for material useful to cross-examine an identified witness with respect to bias as a general request) ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 1115 , 99 S.Ct. 1018 , 59 L.Ed.2d 73 (1979); United States v. DiCarlo, 575 F.2d 952, 959 (1st Cir.1978) (characterizing a reque…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Leo Lehman
(2×)
See United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1248 (9th Cir.1978) (evidence requested to impeach key government witness who has been extensively cross-examined is cumulative and thus not material), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Rudy Tham
See United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1252 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Packard
(2×)
See United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1247 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S. Ct. 2822 , 61 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jaye Wilson
Chanen, supra at 1313 ; accord United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1246 (9 Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,167 United States of America v. Benjamin Lieberman, United States of America v. Jack H. Shapiro
We would be reluctant to exercise them to overturn a conviction that was not the product of manifestly improper conduct by federal officials, id. at 440 ; see United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1246 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979); United States v. Jones, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 7Q, 76, 433 F.2d 1176, 1182 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward Loeswick
To escape the Brady sanction, disclosure “must be made at a time when disclosure would be of value to the accused.” United States v. Davenport, 753 F.2d 1460, 1462 (9th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1247 (9th Cir.1978) (delay in disclosure only requires reversal if it so prejudiced appellant’s preparation or presentation of his defense that he was prevented from receiving a fair trial), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pollitt
See, e.g., United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1247 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S. Ct. 2822 , 61 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lawson
(2×)
See also United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242, 1251 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979) (special verdicts are disfavored in criminal jury trials); 3 Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 512 (2d ed. 1982) (special verdicts are disfavored because they restrict the jury’s right to return a verdict in the teeth of the law and facts.) Defendant also argues that it was inconsistent to give a “but for” test for causation with a proximate cause instruction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Motor Freight Traffic Assn., Inc.
v.
Interstate Commerce Commission
v.
Interstate Commerce Commission
No. 78-1452.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 29, 1979.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.