Citicorp v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 442 U.S. 929 (1979). · Go Syfert
Citicorp v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 442 U.S. 929 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a proceeding to enforce a judgment is collateral to the judgment, and therefore no inquiry into its regularity or validity can be permitted in such a proceeding.”
11 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kim v. Reilly (haw, 2004-06-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Kim v. Reilly
Haw. · 2004 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a proceeding to enforce a judgment is collateral to the judgment, and therefore no inquiry into its regularity or validity can be permitted in such a proceeding.
examined Cited "see" Money Station, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Banc One Corporation, Intervenors (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Citicorp v. Board of Governors, 589 F.2d 1182, 1190 (2d Cir.) (“legislative history indicates the burden is on the applicant affirmatively to establish the net public benefit of its proposal”), cer t. denied, 442 U.S. 929 , 99 S.Ct. 2860 , 61 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Citicorp
v.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
No. 78-1500.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1979.
442 U.S. 929

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.