green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Olson
See People v. Payton, 45 NY2d 300 , 380 NE2d 224 (1978), prob. juris. noted, 99 S Ct 718 (1979). 5 No conclusion one way or the other should be drawn as the result of our failure to dispose of the "knock and announce” problem addressed by the Court of Appeals, because there was no occasion for this court to reach that problem.
cited
Cited "see"
Reiff v. Department of Probation
See People v. Payton, 45 N.Y.2d 300 , 408 N.Y.S.2d 395 , 380 N.E.2d 224 (1978), prob juris noted, 439 U.S. 1044 , 99 S.Ct. 718 , 58 L.Ed.2d 703 (1979). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Payton
v.
New York and Riddick v. New York
v.
New York and Riddick v. New York
No. 78-5420; No. 78-5421.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1978.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Appeals from Ct. App. N. Y. Motions of appellants for leave to proceed in [*1045] forma pauperis granted. In No. 78-5420, probable jurisdiction is noted limited to Question 1 presented by the jurisdictional statement. In No. 78-5421, probable jurisdiction noted. Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 45 N. Y. 2d 300, 380 N. E. 2d 224.