Dixon v. Realty Co., 261 S.E.2d 121 (N.C. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Dixon v. Realty Co., 261 S.E.2d 121 (N.C. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is abundantly clear that the industrial commission has the authority to set aside settlement agreements if the settlement was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence, duress or mutual mistake.”
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McCorquodale v. FRANKLIN BAKING CO. (ncctapp, 2004-09-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) McCorquodale v. FRANKLIN BAKING CO.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is abundantly clear that the industrial commission has the authority to set aside settlement agreements if the settlement was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence, duress or mutual mistake.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DIXON
v.
REALTY CO.
No. 50 PC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 6, 1979.
261 S.E.2d 121
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1979.