Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co., 59 S.E. 826 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907). · Go Syfert
Search
Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co., 59 S.E. 826 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bridges & Joiner
v.
Jaques & Tinsley Company
792.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Dec 20, 1907.
59 S.E. 826
Hendricks & Christian, for plaintiff in error., Alexander & Gary, contra.
Powell.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Powell, J.

1. The failure of the plaintiff in error to file supersedeas bond or pauper affidavit is not ground for dismissal of the writ of error.

2. The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the garnishment proceedings; but did err in rendering judgment against the garnishee, for the reasons given in Fagan v. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 24 (57 S. E. 1052), and cit., and in Ingram v. Jackson Mercantile Co., 2 Ga. App. 218 (58 S. E. 372). Judgment reversed.

Appeal, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. September 16, 1907. Submitted December 18, Decided December 20, 1907. Hendricks & Christian, for plaintiff in error. Alexander & Gary, contra.