Gooden v. Brooks, 261 S.E.2d 919 (N.C. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Gooden v. Brooks, 261 S.E.2d 919 (N.C. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“having multiple objectives of which some are not penal in nature, the statute cannot be deemed a penal statute . . . .”
36 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc. (nc, 1991-10-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc. (2×)
N.C. · 1991 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
having multiple objectives of which some are not penal in nature, the statute cannot be deemed a penal statute . . . .
cited Cited "see" Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, 43 N.C.App. 229, 241 , 259 S.E.2d 1, 9 , disc. rev. denied, 298 N.C. 806 , 261 S.E.2d 919 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Alexander GOODEN et al.
v.
John C. BROOKS, Commissioner of Labor of the State of North Carolina.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 4, 1979.
261 S.E.2d 919
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of North Carolina (2)

Hugh J. Beard, Jr., Robert E. Rader, Jr., for plaintiff.

George W. Lennon, for defendant.

The order allowing discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31 dated 1 May 1979 entered in this case be, and hereby is, vacated. The proceedings in this cause in this Court are dismissed.