United Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 267 S.E.2d 685 (N.C. 1980). · Go Syfert
United Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 267 S.E.2d 685 (N.C. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jolly v. Academy Collection Service, Inc. (ncmd, 2005-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Jolly v. Academy Collection Service, Inc.
M.D.N.C. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morrow, 57 N.C.App. at 21 , 290 S.E.2d at 737 (dismissing slander claim where the complaint “ ‘leaves to conjecture that which must be stated’ ” quoting Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 45 N.C.App. 400, 405-406 , 263 S.E.2d 313, 317 , disc. rev. denied, 300 N.C. 374 , 267 S.E.2d 685 (1980)).
cited Cited "see" Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. Bullock
E.D.N.C. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 300 N.C. 374 , 267 S.E.2d 685 (1980) (failure to perfect title).
discussed Cited "see" Title Ins. Co. of Minn. v. SMITH, DEBNAM
N.C. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
In any event, actual loss or harm is without question an essential element of an action by a third person against a professional person who is alleged to have been negligent in the performance of his contract with his client. 2 Dobbs § 6.11 (cause of action based on lawyer malpractice requires proof of actual damages); see United Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 45 N.C.App. 400, 406 , 263 S.E.2d 313, 318 , disc. rev. denied, 300 N.C. 374 , 267 S.E.2d 685 (1980); see also Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, 322 N.C. 200, 209, 214 , 367 S.E.2d 609, 614, 617 (1988).
cited Cited "see" Northside Station Associates Partnership v. Maddry
N.C. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 45 N.C.App. 400, 405-06 , 263 S.E.2d 313, 317 , disc. rev. denied, 300 N.C. 374 , 267 S.E.2d 685 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wray v. City of Greensboro
N.C. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. , 292 N.C. 668 , 674, 235 S.E.2d 234 , 238 (1977) (quoting Sutton , 277 N.C. at 104 -05 , 176 S.E.2d at 167 ); see also United Leasing Corp. v. Miller , 45 N.C.App. 400 , 405, 263 S.E.2d 313 , 317 (stating that "[a] claim for relief must still satisfy the requirements of the substantive law which gave rise to the pleadings, and no amount of liberalization should seduce the pleader into failing to state enough to give the substantive elements of his claim"), disc. rev. denied , 300 N.C. 374 , 267 S.E.2d 685 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED LEASING CORPORATION
v.
Randall C. MILLER and Powe, Porter, Alphin & Whichard, P. A.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 3, 1980.
267 S.E.2d 685
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Frederick J. Sternberg, for plaintiff.

Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, for defendants.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, N.C.App., 263 S.E.2d 313. Denied.