Greeson v. Byrd, 291 S.E.2d 149 (N.C. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Greeson v. Byrd, 291 S.E.2d 149 (N.C. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“t was the crop to be cultivated and harvested by the plaintiff, not the plaintiff's labor, for which the defendant bargained. thus, there could be no recovery for the value of partial performance of the contract since no part of the crop was produced.”
20 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wing v. Town of Landis (ncctapp, 2004-08-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Wing v. Town of Landis
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
t was the crop to be cultivated and harvested by the plaintiff, not the plaintiff's labor, for which the defendant bargained. thus, there could be no recovery for the value of partial performance of the contract since no part of the crop was produced.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GREESON
v.
BYRD
No. 172 PC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 3, 1982.
291 S.E.2d 149
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 March 1982.