Johnston v. Gaston Cnty., 329 S.E.2d 392 (N.C. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Johnston v. Gaston Cnty., 329 S.E.2d 392 (N.C. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Central Telephone Co. (ncctapp, 2004-11-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Central Telephone Co.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
"The law does not contemplate that administrative boards shall pass upon constitutional questions." Id. ; see Johnston v. Gaston County, 71 N.C.App. 707, 713 , 323 S.E.2d 381, 384 (1984), disc. review denied, 313 N.C. 508 , 329 S.E.2d 392 (1985); Meads v. N.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hugh W. JOHNSTON and Audrey S. Johnston
v.
GASTON COUNTY, Martin Eudy, the Tax Supervisor for Gaston County, and Trumble-McGuirk & Associates, a division of Cole-Layer-Trumble Company, the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation.
45P85.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 2, 1985.
329 S.E.2d 392
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Mullen, Holland & Cooper, Gastonia, for defendant.

Basil L. Whitener, Anne M. Lamm, Gastonia, for plaintiff.

Stott, Hollowell, Palmer, & Windham, Gastonia, for Gaston County & Martin Eudy.

Several Defendants' petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. Denied.