Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Indus. Risk Insurers, 410 S.E.2d 392 (N.C. 1991). · Go Syfert
Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Indus. Risk Insurers, 410 S.E.2d 392 (N.C. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2001 · …ecause the appellee cites no authority for this argument, it is deemed abandoned. ⚠ not in text
35 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Washington v. Cline (ncctapp, 2013-11-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Washington v. Cline (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2013 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
bjecause the appellee cites no authority for this argument, it is deemed abandoned.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Walker v. Walker (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
ecause the appellee cites no authority for this argument, it is deemed abandoned.
discussed Cited "see" Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Industrial Risk Insurers, 102 N.C.App. 59, 64 , 401 S.E.2d 126, 129 (“[b]ecause the appellee cites no authority for this argument, it is deemed abandoned”), aff'd, 330 N.C. 439 , 410 S.E.2d 392 (1991); cf. N.C.R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
METRIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
v.
INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS, Capital Stock Companies.
180A91.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 6, 1991.
410 S.E.2d 392

Bell, Davis & Pitt P.A. by Joseph T. Carruthers and Howell A. Burkhalter, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellant/appellee.

Dean & Gibson by Rodney A. Dean and Michael G. Gibson, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee/appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.