State v. Rogers, 435 S.E.2d 348 (N.C. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Rogers, 435 S.E.2d 348 (N.C. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Clapp (ncctapp, 2000-03-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Clapp (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rogers, 109 N.C.App. 491 , 428 S.E.2d 220 , disc. review denied, 334 N.C. 625 , 435 S.E.2d 348 (1993), cert. denied, Rogers v. N.C., 511 U.S. 1008 , 114 S.Ct. 1378 , 128 L.Ed.2d 54 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pretty (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rogers, 109 N.C.App. 491, 498 , 428 S.E.2d 220, 224 , cert. denied, 334 N.C. 625 , 435 S.E.2d 348 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1102 , 114 S.Ct. 1875 , 128 L.Ed.2d 495 (1994) (holding that the trial court's finding of incompetence is not "inconsistent as a matter of law with a finding that the child may nevertheless be qualified as a declarant out of court to relate truthfully personal information and belief").
discussed Cited "see" State v. Waddell (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rogers, 109 N.C.App. 491, 498 , 428 S.E.2d 220, 224 (child's inability to testify at trial is relevant to whether an earlier hearsay statement was trustworthy), cert. denied, 334 N.C. 625 , 435 S.E.2d 348 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1008 , 114 S.Ct. 1378 , 128 L.Ed.2d 54 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sisk (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
Gen.Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 802 (1992); see State v. Rogers, 109 N.C.App. 491 , 428 S.E.2d 220 , cert. denied, 334 N.C. 625 , 435 S.E.2d 348 (1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 1378 , 128 L.Ed.2d 54 (1994)(holding that in order to admit hearsay evidence, the State must show that the introduction of the evidence is necessary, that the statement is sufficiently reliable and trustworthy, and that the statement fits within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Jerry Ronald ROGERS.
308P93.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 9, 1993.
435 S.E.2d 348
Published

M. Patricia DeVine, Asst. Public Defender, for defendant.

James C. Gulick, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Carl R. Fox, Dist. Atty., for the State.

Prior report: 109 N.C.App. 491, 428 S.E.2d 220.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of September 1993."