Phillips v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 456 S.E.2d 318 (N.C. 1995). · Go Syfert
Phillips v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 456 S.E.2d 318 (N.C. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: Suarez v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (ncwd, 2000-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Suarez v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
W.D.N.C. · 2000 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Phillips v. Winston-Salem Forsyth County Bd. of Educ., 117 N.C.App. 274, 277, 450 S.E.2d 753, 756 (1994), disc. rev. den., 340 N.C. 115 , 456 S.E.2d 318 (1995). "[Wjhen defamatory words are spoken with the intent that the words be reduced to writing (or with television, broadcast), and the words are in fact written (broadcast), the publication is both slander and libel.” Id. at 278, 450 S.E.2d at 756 , quoting Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C.App. 255, 261 , 393 S.E.2d 134, 137 , disc. rev. den., 327 N.C. 426 , 395 S.E.2d 675 (1990). 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PHILLIPS
v.
WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.
No. 58P95.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 6, 1995.
456 S.E.2d 318
Published

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 1995.