Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith, 457 S.E.2d 599 (N.C. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith, 457 S.E.2d 599 (N.C. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case · …t is well established in north carolina that the breach of a voluntarily adopted safety rule is some evidence of defendant's negligence. ⚠ not in text
30 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Doe v. United States
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Doe v. United States (2×)
unknown court · 2019 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
t is well established in north carolina that the breach of a voluntarily adopted safety rule is some evidence of defendant's negligence.
cited Cited "see" Thompson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
REGINA ANNETTE PEAL, Incompetent, by Her General Guardian, JAMES WALTER PEAL, JR., Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
HOWARD THOMAS SMITH, Defendant, and CIANBRO CORPORATION and WILLIAMS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Joint Venture D/B/A CIANBRO-WILLIAMS BROS., Defendants-Appellants
398PA94.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 2, 1995.
457 S.E.2d 599
Homthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland, L.L.R, by L.P. Homthal, Jr., M.H. Hood Ellis, and Michael P. Sanders, for plaintiff-appellee. , Maupin Taylor Ellis & Adams, P.A., by James A.- Roberts, III, M. Keith Kapp, and Richard N. Cook, for defendant-appellants Cianbro Corp. and Williams Bros. Constr. Co.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
PER CURIAM.

Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.