green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Leveris
See id. (holding that the plaintiff’s express easement of right-of-way for ingress and egress over the defendants’ property would not be enlarged to allow the installation of an underground utility and telephone lines on the defendants’ property, absent express provision for such, although the plaintiff’s deed restricted his lot to residential use). *282 Defendants also contend that summary judgment was improper because there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendants installed their sewer line under a claim of right pursuant to a permit issued by the Harnett County …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benjamin L. COLVIN, Administrator of the Estate of Margaret T. Colvin, Deceased, and Benjamin L. Colvin, Plaintiffs,
v.
Glenn Edward BADGETT, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Wendell Sanderford MCDONALD, Third-Party Defendant.
v.
Glenn Edward BADGETT, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Wendell Sanderford MCDONALD, Third-Party Defendant.
508A95.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 10, 1996.
Per Curiam.
Published
[*554] Ligon & Hinton, by George Ligon, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.
Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, L.L.P. by Steven M. Sartorio, Raleigh, for defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.