Tate Terrace Realty Investors, Inc. v. Currituck Cnty., 496 S.E.2d 394 (N.C. 1997). · Go Syfert
Tate Terrace Realty Investors, Inc. v. Currituck Cnty., 496 S.E.2d 394 (N.C. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“superior court in its posture of an appellate court, . . . may not consider a matter not addressed by the”
17 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sack v. North Carolina State University (ncctapp, 2002-12-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Sack v. North Carolina State University
N.C. Ct. App. · 2002 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
superior court in its posture of an appellate court, . . . may not consider a matter not addressed by the
discussed Cited "see" Wilson v. Wilson
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tate Terrace Realty Investors, Inc. v. Currituck County, 127 N.C.App. 212, 224 , 488 S.E.2d 845, 852 , disc. review denied, 347 N.C. 409 , 496 S.E.2d 394 (1997)(reversing the taxing of costs to respondents where costs were imposed in consequence of the trial court's erroneous decision on the merits).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
TATE TERRACE REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
v.
CURRITUCK COUNTY
No. 467P97.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 4, 1997.
496 S.E.2d 394

Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 December 1997. Motion by respondents (Currituck and Board of Commissioners) to dismiss notice of appeal allowed 4 December 1997.