green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2004 ·
…ince the policy in question only provided the minimum statutory-required coverage of 25,000/50,000, the policy was not required to provide uim coverage under section 20-279.21(b)(4).
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2001 ·
…pursuant to subdivision (b)(4), uim coverage may be obtained only if the policyholder has liability insurance in excess of the minimum statutory requirement
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Purcell v. Downey
(2×)
ince the policy in question only provided the minimum statutory-required coverage of 25,000/50,000, the policy was not required to provide uim coverage under section 20-279.21(b)(4).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pinney v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
(2×)
pursuant to subdivision (b)(4), uim coverage may be obtained only if the policyholder has liability insurance in excess of the minimum statutory requirement
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradley R. MORGAN and wife, Tonja D. Morgan and Bradley Dale Morgan
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.
175A98.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 6, 1998.
Wheatly, Wheatly, Nobles & Weeks, P.A. by Stevenson L. Weeks, Beaufort, for plaintiff-appellants.
Bailey, Way & Jerzak by Glenn Bailey, Morehead City, for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.