Pittman v. Int'l Paper Co., 519 S.E.2d 524 (N.C. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Pittman v. Int'l Paper Co., 519 S.E.2d 524 (N.C. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case · …the facts found by the commission are conclusive upon appeal to this court when they are supported by competent evidence, even when there is evidence to support contrary findings. ⚠ not in text
61 citation events (55 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Veneris v. Domtar Paper Co., LLC (ncctapp, 2014-01-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Veneris v. Domtar Paper Co., LLC (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2014 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
the facts found by the commission are conclusive upon appeal to this court when they are supported by competent evidence, even when there is evidence to support contrary findings.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hunt v. North Carolina State University (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Whether such good ground has been shown is discretionary and will not be reviewed on appeal absent a showing of manifest abuse of discretion."); see also Pittman v. International Paper Co., 132 N.C.App. 151, 156 , 510 S.E.2d 705, 708 (1999), aff'd by 351 N.C. 42 , 519 S.E.2d 524 (1999)(stating that "in exercising its discretion to receive additional evidence, the Commission should consider all the circumstances *386 of the case, including the delay involved in taking additional evidence, and should not encourage a lack of pre-deposition preparation by counsel or witnesses").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jenkins v. Easco Aluminum Corp. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Pittman v. International Paper Co., 132 N.C.App. 151 , 510 S.E.2d 705 , disc. review denied, 350 N.C. 310 , 534 S.E.2d 596 , affirmed, 351 N.C. 42 , 519 S.E.2d 524 (1999), where the plaintiff made a similar argument with regard to a Dr. Markworth's deposition testimony, but there were "various findings throughout the Opinion and Award of the Commission indicat[ing] consideration of Dr. Markworth's opinion." Id. at 159, 510 S.E.2d at 710 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James R. PITTMAN, Employee,
v.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, Employer, Wausau Insurance Company, Carrier.
86A99.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 8, 1999.
519 S.E.2d 524
Per Curiam.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)

[*525] Gillespie & Higgins, by James B. Gillespie, Jr., Wilmington, for plaintiff-appellee.

Teague, Campbell, Dennis & Gorham, L.L.P., by Gregory M. Willis, Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.