green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hoots v. Hoots
Therefore, in order to successfully challenge a trial court's equitable distribution award, "a party must show that the decision was unsupported by reason and could not have been the result of a competent inquiry." Id. at 416-17, 508 S.E.2d at 304 (internal quotation marks omitted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
OPENSHAW
v.
BUXTON CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC
v.
BUXTON CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC
No. 494P98.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 4, 1999.
Published
Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 February 1999.