Dobo v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the City of Wilmington, 576 S.E.2d 324 (N.C. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Dobo v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the City of Wilmington, 576 S.E.2d 324 (N.C. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
G. WILLIAM DOBO and Wife, BARBARA B. DOBO, Petitioners
v.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF WILMINGTON and CITY OF WILMINGTON, Respondents
256A02.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 28, 2003.
576 S.E.2d 324
Kenneth A. Shanklin and Matthew A. Nichols for petitioner-appellants. , Thomas C. Pollard, City Attorney, and Dolores M. Williams, Assistant City Attorney, for respondent-appellees.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, New Hanover County, for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.