State v. Wood, 602 S.E.2d 682 (N.C. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Wood, 602 S.E.2d 682 (N.C. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Jones v. Harrelson and Smith Contractors, LLC (ncctapp, 2008-12-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Jones v. Harrelson and Smith Contractors, LLC
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tarrant v. Freeway Foods of Greensboro, Inc., 163 N.C.App. 504, 508 , 593 S.E.2d 808, 811 (declining to dismiss appeal as interlocutory when plaintiff took voluntary dismissal of remaining claims pending in the trial court after giving notice of appeal but before case was heard in the Court of Appeals), disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 739 , 603 S.E.2d 126 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Stein v. Asheville City Board of Education
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tarrant v. Freeway Foods of Greensboro, Inc., 163 N.C.App. 504, 507-08 , 593 S.E.2d 808, 811 (declining to dismiss appeal from partial summary judgment order, *84 even though initially interlocutory, because of plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of the remaining claims prior to the Court's ruling), disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 739 , 603 S.E.2d 126 (2004).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Nicks v. Nicks
N.C. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., White v. Davis, 163 N.C.App. 21 , 26, 592 S.E.2d 265 , 269, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 739 , 603 S.E.2d 127 (2004) (holding delay of seven months was not prejudicial).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina
v.
James Carey WOOD.
No. 295P04..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 12, 2004.
602 S.E.2d 682
E. Clarke Dummit, Winston-Salem, for James Carey Wood., Patricia Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.
Published

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 17th day of June 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of June 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."