green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re AH
See In re V.L.B., 168 N.C.App. 679, 685 , 608 S.E.2d 787, 791 (holding that trial court did not err in considering year-old psychological evaluations in assessing severity and chronic nature of respondents' mental health conditions and "by concluding, based on respondents' history, that they did not have the ability to provide a safe and appropriate home for the minor child"), disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 633 , 614 S.E.2d 924 (2005); Smith v. Alleghany County Dep't of Soc.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re A.H.
See In re V.L.B., 168 N.C.App. 679 , 685, 608 S.E.2d 787 , 791 (holding that trial court did not err in considering year-old psychological evaluations in assessing severity and chronic nature of respondents' mental health conditions and "by concluding, based on respondents' history, that they did not have the ability to provide a safe and appropriate home for the minor child"), disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 633 , 614 S.E.2d 924 (2005); Smith v. Alleghany County Dep't of Soc.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re LAB
See In re V.L.B., 168 N.C.App. 679, 683 , 608 S.E.2d 787, 791 (undisputed finding of previous termination of parental rights with respect to another child, coupled with chronic and severe mental health problems on the part of both parents, supported the trial court's conclusion that grounds to terminate parental rights existed under § 7B-1111(a)(9)), disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 633 , 614 S.E.2d 924 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re L.A.B.
See In re V.L.B., 168 N.C.App. 679 , 683, 608 S.E.2d 787 , 791 (undisputed finding of previous termination of parental rights with respect to another child, coupled with chronic and severe mental health problems on the part of both parents, supported the trial court's conclusion that grounds to terminate parental rights existed under § 7B-1111(a)(9)), disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 633 , 614 S.E.2d 924 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re T.B. appealed by Tamieka M.
No. 598PA04..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 4, 2005.
Peter Wood, for Tamieka M., Tron Faulk, for Lee County Dept. of SS., Eddie Winstead, Sanford, for Guardian Ad Litem.
Published
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th day of November 2004 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).