In Re Jzm, 655 S.E.2d 832 (N.C. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Jzm, 655 S.E.2d 832 (N.C. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Ard (ncctapp, 2010-06-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Ard
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re J.Z.M., R.O.M., R.D.M. & D.T.F., 184 N.C.App. 474, 480 , 646 S.E.2d 631, 635 (2007) (Steelman, J. dissenting) (stating that there was a lack of prejudice because "[n]o assertion [was] made that had [respondent-mother] been allowed visitation that she would have been able to demonstrate that she had rectified" the circumstances which led to her children's removal), rev'd and remanded per curiam, 362 N.C. 167 , 655 S.E.2d 832 (2008) (adopting the reasoning of the Court of Appeals dissent).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of J.Z.M., R.O.M., R.D.M., and D.T.F., minor children.
366A07.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 25, 2008.
655 S.E.2d 832
Per Curiam.
Published

Mecklenburg County Attorney's Office, by J. Edward Yeager, Jr. and Tyrone C. Wade, for petitioner-appellant Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, by Sarah A. Motley, Charlotte, for appellant Guardian ad Litem.

Charlotte Gail Blake, Jefferson, for respondent-appellee mother.

[*833] PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of respondent's remaining assignments of error.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.