green
Positive treatment
9.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Land v. Whitley
Id. at 352 (remanding the case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the merits).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephens v. ADP TotalSource DE IV
(2×)
See Burton v. Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, Inc., 362 N.C. 352 , 661 S.E.2d 242 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jacinda Burton, Administratrix of the Estate of Michael C. Burton
v.
Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors, Inc. and Davis, Martin, Powell & Associates, Inc.; Donna Davis, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles M. Davis v. Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors, Inc. and Davis, Martin, Powell & Associates, Inc.
v.
Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors, Inc. and Davis, Martin, Powell & Associates, Inc.; Donna Davis, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles M. Davis v. Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors, Inc. and Davis, Martin, Powell & Associates, Inc.
447P07.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 10, 2008.
Hudson.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
ORDER
Finding that the order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion to dismiss affects a substantial right and will work injury if not corrected before final judgment, we allow defendant’s Petition for Discretionary Review for the sole purpose of remanding the matter to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the merits. Defendant’s Alternative Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied.
By Order of the Court in Conference, this 10th day of April, 2008.
Hudson, J. For the Court