green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Does v. Cooper
Packingham,, 777 S.E.2d at 753 (Hudson, J., dissenting) (Internet use restrictions that apply to all registered sex offenders “sweep[ ] too broadly regarding who is subject to [the] prohibitions”); State v. Packingham, 229 N.C.App. 293 , 748 S.E.2d 146, 152 (N.C.Ct.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
John Doe v. Kamala Harris
See, e.g., Doe v. Nebraska, 898 F.Supp.2d 1086 , 1093 1107-08 (D.Neb.2012) (Nebraska statute that required sex offenders to disclose “remote communication device identifiers, addresses, domain names, and Internet and blog sites used” was subject to intermediate scrutiny); White v. Baker, 696 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1307-08 (N.D.Ga.2010) (Georgia statute requiring sex offenders to produce their email addresses, usernames, and password' was subject to intermediate scrutiny); State v. Packingham, 748 S.E.2d 146, 149-50 (N.C.App.2013) (North Carolina statute banning use of social networking sites by s…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
DEMARIO JAQUINTA ROLLINS
v.
DEMARIO JAQUINTA ROLLINS
No. 8A13.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 4, 2013.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Laura E. Parker, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
,
Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Daniel R. Pollitt and Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defenders, for defendant-appellant.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.