green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
17.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…e review the evidence in the present case in the light most favorable to efendant, in order to determine whether there is substantial evidence of each element of the defense.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Value Health Sols. Inc. v. Pharm. Research Assocs., Inc.
the essential elements of fraud are: (1) false representation or concealment of a material fact, (2) reasonably calculated to deceive, (3) made with intent to deceive, (4) which does in fact deceive, (5) resulting in damage to the injured party.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Mercer
e review the evidence in the present case in the light most favorable to efendant, in order to determine whether there is substantial evidence of each element of the defense.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Mercer
e review the evidence in the present case in the light most favorable to efendant, in order to determine whether there is substantial evidence of each element of the defense.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Poulos v. Poulos
Id. at 580–81, 768 S.E.2d at 300 (2014) (“Because plaintiff's claims regarding the . . . trust do not arise ‘within the context of a distinct agreement or transaction between the spouses, there was no fiduciary duty owed to plaintiff sufficient to survive summary judgment on her claims for constructive fraud and breach of fiduciary duty’”; citation omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Baldelli v. Baldelli
Ward , 237 N.C.App. at 577-78 , 768 S.E.2d at 299 (citation omitted).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Poulos v. Poulos
(5×)
App. at 580, 768 S.E.2d at 300 (claim for breach of fiduciary duty must “arise within the context of a distinct agreement or transaction between the spouses” (citation omitted)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN THE MATTER OF C.W.F.
No. 84PA14.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 23, 2015.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Josephine Tetteh, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner-appellant State of North Carolina.
,
Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by David W. Andrews, Assistant Appellate Defender, for respondent-appellee C. W.F.
,
Miranda R. McCoy for Jackson Springs Treatment Facility, amicus curiae.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2) · North Carolina Business Court (1)
PER CURIAM.
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.