Wilkinson v. City of Kansas City, 949 S.W.2d 629 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Wilkinson v. City of Kansas City, 949 S.W.2d 629 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of Missouri v. Christopher Robert Sokolic (moctapp, 2023-02-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri v. Christopher Robert Sokolic
Mo. Ct. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
See State v. Glass, 136 S.W.3d 496, 514 (Mo. banc 2004) (noting “[d]eliberation may also be inferred when there are multiple wounds or repeated blows”); Tisius, 92 S.W.3d at 764 (noting deliberation may be inferred from “multiple wounds, or repeated blows”); State v. Sandles, 740 S.W.2d 169, 177-78 (Mo. banc 1987) (holding 20 stab and slash wounds supported a reasonable inference of deliberation); State v. Shaddox, 598 S.W.3d 691 , 696 (Mo. App. S.D 2020) (internal quotation omitted) (noting “evidence of multiple stab wounds [or] repeated blows” may support an inference of delibera…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Xavier Perkins
Mo. Ct. App. · 2020 · confidence medium
“Further, deliberation may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the crime, and such an inference is supported by a lack of concern for and a failure to attempt to aid the victim.” State v. Alexander, 505 S.W.3d 384, 393 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016), citing State v. Moore, 949 S.W.2d 629, 631, 633 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri v. Ralph Alexander (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Mo. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
State v. Moore, 949 S.W.2d 629, 631, 633 (Mo. App. *394 W.D. 1997).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. John L. Dailey
Mo. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
State v. Moore, 949 S.W.2d 629, 633 (Mo.App.W.D.1997).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Johnson
Mo. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
State v. Moore, 949 S.W.2d 629, 632 (Mo.App.1997).
discussed Cited "see" STATE OF MISSOURI v. JOSHUA L. OLDHAM
Mo. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Moore, 949 S.W.2d 629, 632 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997) (firing multiple shots at a victim indicated there was time for deliberation between shots); State v. Foote, 791 S.W.2d 879, 884 (Mo. App. E.D. 1990) (the decision to continue an attack after a victim is incapacitated supports an inference of deliberation).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tisius
Mo. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Skillicom 944 S.W.2d 877, 887 (Mo. banc 1997); see also State v. Moore, 949 S.W.2d 629 , 633 (Mo.App.1997). 37 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fred WILKINSON, Jr.
v.
CITY OF KANSAS CITY, Missouri
No. WD 53396.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jul 8, 1997.
949 S.W.2d 629
Michael G. Newbold, Yonke, Arnold, New-bold & Regan, P.C., Kansas City, for appellant., Kathleen A. Hauser, City Attorney, Cecilia O’Connor Abbott, Assistant City Attorney, Kansas City, for respondent.
Hanna, Smith, Ulrich.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fred Wilkinson, Jr. appeals the judgment of the circuit court affirming the decision of the Personnel Appeals Board of Kansas City (Board) sustaining the suspension and termination of his employment with the City of Kansas City (City). Mr. Wilkinson claims that the Board’s decision was unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable, and was an abuse of discretion.

The judgment of the circuit court upholding the Board’s decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).