Missouri Gaming Co. v. Gregoire, 967 S.W.2d 243 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Missouri Gaming Co. v. Gregoire, 967 S.W.2d 243 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Ruqaiyah Hunter v. Division of Employment Security (moctapp, 2025-04-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ruqaiyah Hunter v. Division of Employment Security
Mo. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
Ryan v. Ryan, 124 S.W.3d 512, 516 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004)) (“[A]cts taken by an administrative agency that exceed authority . . . are void ab initio.”); Cantrell v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 26 S.W.3d 824, 828 (Mo. App. W.D. 2000) (citing Cohen v. Mo. Bd. of Pharmacy, 967 S.W.2d 243, 248-49 (Mo. App. W.D. 1998)) (“When an administrative agency usurps its authority, its unlawful act is void.”); cf. Farmer v. Barlow Truck Lines, Inc., 979 S.W.2d 169, 170 (Mo. banc 1998) (citing Bodenhausen v. Mo. Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 900 S.W.2d 621 (Mo. banc 1995); Soars v…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Cantrell v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
Mo. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
Cohen v. Missouri Board of Pharmacy, 967 S.W.2d 243, 249 (Mo.App.1998).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hampton v. Hampton
Mo. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
Cohen v. Missouri Bd. of Pharmacy, 967 S.W.2d 243, 248 (Mo.App.1998).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Director, Missouri Department of Public Safety v. Murr
Mo. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
“Our review is limited to determining whether the ‘decision is in excess of jurisdiction, unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, or is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.’ ” Cohen v. Missouri Bd. of Pharmacy, 967 S.W.2d 243, 246 (Mo.App.1998) (quoting Burgdohf v. Board of Police Comm’rs, 936 S.W.2d 227, 230 (Mo.App.1996)).
cited Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Ryan v. Ryan
Mo. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cohen v. Mo. Bd. of Pharmacy, 967 S.W.2d 243 , 247-48 (Mo.App.1998); Casey v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 830 S.W.2d 478, 480-81 (Mo.App. 1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The MISSOURI GAMING COMPANY, d/b/a, Argosy Riverside Casino
v.
Betty GREGOIRE, Assessor for Platte County, Missouri
No. WD 54171.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Mar 24, 1998.
967 S.W.2d 243
Michael Newport, St. Louis, for Appellant., Thomas Rynard, Government Counsel, Kansas City, for Respondent.
Hanna, Smart, Smith.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Missouri Gaming Company, d/b/a Argosy Riverside Casino (Argosy) has its place of business in Platte County. The Platte County assessor’s office assessed Argosy’s personal property, some of which Argosy believed was double assessed. Argosy appealed the assessor’s decision to the Platte County Board of Equalization. The appeal was filed well past the time for appeal as set forth in § 137.385, RSMo 1994. Argosy contends that it has a right of appeal pursuant to § 138.100.2, RSMo 1994, and faults the assessor’s office for its failure to file its appeal on time under § 137.385, RSMo 1994, because the assessor’s office sent it an incorrect notice. The matter was appealed to the State Tax Commission which held that Argosy was not double assessed and that Argosy had not filed its appeal timely. A memorandum explaining our decision has been furnished the parties. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.