State v. Draper, 169 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Draper, 169 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Department of Mental Health v. The Honorable Michael C. Heffernon (moctapp, 2025-03-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Department of Mental Health v. The Honorable Michael C. Heffernon
Mo. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
Moreover, because of the quasi-criminal nature of ordinance violations, the burden is on the city “to produce evidence of such a convincing nature as to convince the trier of facts that defendant was guilty of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.” City of Kansas City v. Oxley, 579 S.W.2d 113, 114 (Mo. banc 1979) (internal quotations omitted); City of Kansas City v. Tyson, 169 S.W.3d 927, 928 (Mo. App. 2005). 11 ordinance violations are governed by Chapter 479 (entitled “Municipal Courts and Traffic Courts”) and Rule 37.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents. (2×)
Mo. · 2015 · confidence medium
Moreover, because of the quasi-criminal nature of ordinance violations, the burden is on the city “to produce evidence of such a convincing nature as to convince the trier of facts that defendant was guilty of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.” City of Kansas City v. Oxley, 579 S.W.2d 113, 114 (Mo. banc 1979) (internal quotations omitted); City of Kansas City v. Tyson, 169 S.W.3d 927, 928 (Mo.App.2005).
examined Cited as authority (rule) United Pharmacal Co. of Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Board of Pharmacy (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Mo. · 2006 · confidence medium
The two exceptions are J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875 (Mo. banc 2000), and City of Kansas City v. Tyson, 169 S.W.3d 927, 929 (Mo. App. W.D.2005), which expressly followed J.S. v. Beaird .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Wade
Mo. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See also, City of Kansas City v. Tyson, 169 S.W.3d 927, 928 (Mo.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Timothy L. DRAPER, Appellant
WD 64496.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Sep 6, 2005.
169 S.W.3d 927
Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, MO, for appellant., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Holliger, Ulrich, Ellis.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Draper appeals his conviction following jury trial for the class B felony of committing violence against an offender, section 217.385, RSMo 2000, and sentence of five years imprisonment. Mr. Draper raises one point on appeal. He contends that the trial court erred in allowing Cynthia Rushefsky’s testimony regarding a possible motive for Mr. Draper’s actions because there was no evidence Mr. Draper had any knowledge of the facts constituting the motive to which Ms. Rushefsky testified and thus the testimony was irrelevant. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).