State v. Young, 280 S.W.3d 111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Young, 280 S.W.3d 111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of Missouri v. Robert A. Young (moctapp, 2020-06-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri v. Robert A. Young
Mo. Ct. App. · 2020 · confidence medium
“It is generally presumed that a jury will properly follow an instruction given by the court.” State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009) (citing State v. Madison, 997 S.W.2d 16, 21 (Mo. banc 1999)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JUSTIN KEITH LONG
Mo. Ct. App. · 2020 · confidence medium
See State v. Rose, 86 S.W.3d 90, 97 (Mo. App. 2002) (“HGN evidence is admissible as a reliable measure of an illegal level of intoxication”); State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 116-17 (Mo. App. 2009).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ward v. Steele
E.D. Mo. · 2020 · confidence medium
“The granting of a mistrial is a drastic action that should only be taken in those circumstances where no other curative action would remove the alleged prejudice suffered by the defendant.” State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 116 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Staten
Mo. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 116 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri v. Richard L. Evans
Mo. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Mo.App.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri v. Melvin Huffman (2×) also: Cited "see"
Mo. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 119 (Mo.App.E.D.2009).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri v. Kathryn Avent (2×)
Mo. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 114 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009). 8 The majority opinion refers to the trial as an evidentiary hearing.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Salazar (2×) also: Cited "see"
Mo. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
“The granting of a mistrial is a drastic action that should only be taken in those circumstances where no other curative action would remove the alleged prejudice suffered by the defendant.” State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 116 (Mo.App.E.D.2009).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Foster v. State
Mo. Ct. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
Granting a mistrial “is a drastic remedy that should be employed only in extraordinary circumstances in which prejudice to the defendant can be removed in no other way.” State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 118 (Mo.App.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Thompson
Mo. Ct. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
E.D.2008). “[A]dmission of improper evidence is harmless if the other evidence of guilt is overwhelming.” State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Mo.App.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Seeler (2×)
Mo. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Stone, 280 S.W.3d 111 , 116 n. 3 (Mo.App.2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri
v.
Darnell YOUNG
No. ED 91052.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Feb 3, 2009.
280 S.W.3d 111
Scott Rosenblum, Brocea Smith, Clayton, MO, for appellant., Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buch-heim, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
III, Mooney, Richter.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Young appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions by a jury for forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000; and incest, Section 568.020 RSMo 2000. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).