Petelik v. Motor Control Specialists, 311 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Petelik v. Motor Control Specialists, 311 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ronald Pinther v. American National Property and Casualty Insurance Company American National Insurance Company and Philip Maggard (wyo, 2024-02-08) · Strongest negative: Hansa Consult of North America, LLC v. Hansaconsult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH (nh, 2011-12-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Hansa Consult of North America, LLC v. Hansaconsult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH
N.H. · 2011 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Jitterswing, Inc. v. Francorp, Inc., 311 S.W.3d 828, 830 (Mo. App. 2010) (holding that a forum selection clause does not require tort claims between parties to a contract to be litigated in the selected forum despite the plaintiffs allegation that the defendant had committed tortious actions “under the agreement”).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Ronald Pinther v. American National Property and Casualty Insurance Company American National Insurance Company and Philip Maggard
Wyo. · 2024 · confidence medium
Jitterswing, Inc. v. Francorp, Inc., 311 S.W.3d 828, 830 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Thieret Family, LLC. v. Delta Plains Services, LLC, and Justin A. Brown, Adam Horton and Mike Still, Defendants/Respondents. (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Mo. Ct. App. · 2021 · confidence medium
“Parties to a contract may agree in advance to submit to personal jurisdiction in a given court by means of a forum selection clause.” Jitterswing, Inc. v. Francorp, Inc., 311 S.W.3d 828, 830 (Mo. App. E.D. 2010).6 “A forum selection clause of a contract selects the venue in 6 We acknowledge that the Finance Agreements contain a choice of law provision stating that it is “governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Texas.” However, in Missouri, “forum selection clauses are … procedural, 11 which a cause of action is to be tried.” Burke, 114 S.W.3d at 279 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stephen PETELIK, Respondent,
v.
MOTOR CONTROL SPECIALISTS and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Appellants
ED 93220.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Feb 23, 2010.
311 S.W.3d 828
Ellen E. Morgan, Ballwin, MO, for Respondent., Kevin M. Leahy, Catherine Vale Jo-chens, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellants.
Norton, Hoff, Mooney.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Motor Control Specialists and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) final award of worker’s compensation benefits to Stephen Petelik (“Claimant”) for an injury suffered to his low back as a result of an August 19, 2003 work accident. Appellants also appeal the decision of the Commission declining to review the ALJ’s temporary award of worker’s compensation benefits to Claimant. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s final award, which incorporates the temporary award, is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).