State v. Isaac, 314 S.W.3d 348 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Isaac, 314 S.W.3d 348 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: C.M.G. v. B.M.C., Respondent/Respondent, O.R.C., Minor, and State of Missouri, Dept. of Social Services, Family Support Division, Respondent/Respondent. (moctapp, 2025-02-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) C.M.G. v. B.M.C., Respondent/Respondent, O.R.C., Minor, and State of Missouri, Dept. of Social Services, Family Support Division, Respondent/Respondent.
Mo. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
Section 210.823.1(2); F.J.M., 637 S.W.3d at 137. 6 Here, Petitioner sought to assert a claim challenging, pursuant to section 210.823.1, the acknowledgment of paternity “on the basis of material fact.” Section 210.823 does not define the term “material mistake of fact.” S.A.S. v. B.P., 314 S.W.3d 348, 355 (Mo. App. E.D. 2010).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Doe v. Replogle
Mo. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
“We must determine whether the moving party has demonstrated an ‘undisputed right to judgment as a matter of law 1 on the basis of the material facts about which there is no genuine dispute.” S.A.S. v. B.P., 314 S.W.3d 348, 352 (Mo.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Harold D. ISAAC, Jr., Appellant.
ED 92378.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Mar 9, 2010.
314 S.W.3d 348
Glenn A. Norton, P.
Published

Margaret M. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., John W. Grantham, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harold D. Isaac, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000, forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000, first-degree burglary, Section 569.160 RSMo 2000, felonious restraint, Section 565.120 RSMo 2000, and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).