State v. Young, 332 S.W.3d 129 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Young, 332 S.W.3d 129 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“created by statute and not the constitution, aljs are state employees with certain due process rights . . . .”
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lutes v. Schaefer (moctapp, 2014-05-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Lutes v. Schaefer
Mo. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
created by statute and not the constitution, aljs are state employees with certain due process rights....
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) James Lutes v. Honorable Lee B. Schaefer (2×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
Mo. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
created by statute and not the constitution, aljs are state employees with certain due process rights . . . .
cited Cited "see" Deborah Barkley v. McKeever Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Price Chopper
Mo. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Herschel v. Nixon, 332 S.W.3d 129, 134 (Mo. App. W.D. 2010).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Molder v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER
Mo. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Herschel v. Nixon, 332 S.W.3d 129 , 132 n. 3 (Mo.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Dion E. YOUNG, Appellant
WD 71144.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Nov 23, 2010.
332 S.W.3d 129
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for appellant., Shaun J. Mackelprang and Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Hardwick, Pfeiffer, Witt.
Published

Order

PER CURIAM.

Dion Young appeals his convictions on one count of second-degree murder, two counts of unlawful use of a weapon, four counts of first-degree assault, and seven counts of armed criminal action. He contends the circuit court erred in excluding hearsay evidence concerning a statement by a shooting victim. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of convictions.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).