State v. Weiss, 58 S.W.3d 627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Weiss, 58 S.W.3d 627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Christopher Endicott (moctapp, 2020-02-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Christopher Endicott
Mo. Ct. App. · 2020 · confidence medium
Use of force in defense of another is included in the MAI–CR3d 306.00 series titled “INSTRUCTIONS REQUIRED WHETHER REQUESTED OR NOT.” The notes on use accompanying the instruction mandate, without qualification, “Whenever there is evidence supporting this defense, this instruction must be given.” MAI-CR3d 306.08A, n.2.3 “Failure to give an MAI-CR instruction in accordance with an accompanying note on use is error.” State v. White, 58 S.W.3d 627, 633 (Mo. App. W.D. 2001); Rule 28.02(f).4 A holding from this Court abrogating the trial court’s obligation to instruct on use of forc…
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Weddle
Mo. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
State v. White, 58 S.W.3d 627, 633 (Mo.App.2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. O'TOOLE
Mo. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. White, 58 S.W.3d 627, 631 (Mo.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
v.
Brian WEISS
No. ED 78624.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Aug 28, 2001.
58 S.W.3d 627
Stacey F. Sullivan, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant., Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Crahan, Mooney, Sullivan.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian Weiss (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of voluntary manslaughter, armed criminal actions, and first degree assault. Defendant alleges trial court error in refusing to instruct the jury on self-defense. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on self-defense because submission of a self-defense instruction was not supported by the evidence when viewed in a light most favorable to Defendant. State v. Crawford, 904 S.W.2d 402, 405 (Mo.App. E.D. 1995). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 80.25(b).