Pallas v. State, 654 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Pallas v. State, 654 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Seitz v. State (fladistctapp, 2004-01-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Seitz v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla.1995) and Pallas v. State, 636 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), rev. granted & decision approved, 654 So.2d 127 (Fla.1995).
cited Cited "see" Jerry Lee Staley v. Kurt Jones
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pallas v. State, 654 So.2d 127 (Fla.1995). 18 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Smith (2×)
D.C. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pallas v. Florida, 636 So.2d 1358, 1360 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1994) (interpreting similar language), aff'd, 654 So.2d 127 (Fla.1995); Culbreath, supra note 5, 667 So.2d at 159-60. 8 Therefore, one may be prosecuted for “on more than one occasion” ... “repeatedly5’ ... “harassing” another person with the requisite intent.
John PALLAS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
84006.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 1995.
654 So. 2d 127
Shaw.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Manuel Alvarez, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Pallas v. State, 636 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), wherein the district court upheld the constitutionality of Florida's anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve the decision in Pallas on this issue.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion.

KOGAN, Justice, specially concurring.

With the exception of the reservations that I stated in Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995), (Kogan, J., specially concurring), I concur with majority.