green
Positive treatment
10.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1929 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1929
1977
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
J.R. v. Barbara Palmer, etc.
(2×)
Co., 117 So. 786, 788 (Fla. 1928) (quoting Newcomb v. City of Indianapolis, 40 N.E. 919, 921-22 (Ind. 1895)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Temple v. Aujla
Co., 95 Fla. 1010, 1015-16 , 117 So. 786, 788 (1928)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Davis v. Travelers Indemnity Company Of America
Rosenberg v. Ryder Leasing, Inc., 168 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d D.C.A.1964); Girard Trust Co. v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010, 1015-16 , 117 So. 786, 788 (1928).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Davis v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America
Rosenberg v. Ryder Leasing, Inc., 168 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d D.C.A.1964); Girard Trust Co. v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010, 1015-16 , 117 So. 786, 788 (1928).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Coca-Cola Co., Food Division v. State, Dept.
Co., 60 Fla. 465 , 54 So. 394 , 397 (1911); those "necessary for the exercise of the [right] or the *1082 performance of the [duty]", Girard Trust Co. v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010 , 117 So. 786, 788 (1928); those "necessary to accomplish the [stated governmental purpose]", Hancock v. Karel, 127 Fla. 451 , 173 So. 274, 275 (1937), citing Bailey v. Van Pelt, 78 Fla. 337 , 82 So. 789 , 792 (1919); and those "necessary to carry out the power or right and make it effectual and complete", Deltona Corporation v. Florida Public Service Commission, 220 So.2d 905, 907 (Fla. 1969).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brooks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Further, in Girard Trust Company v. Tampashores Development Company, 95 Fla. 1010, 1015-16 , 117 So. 786, 788 (1928), the supreme court said: Where a statute requires an act to be done for the benefit of another or forbids the doing of an act which may be to his injury, though no action be given in express terms by the statute for the omission or commission, the general rule of law is that the party injured should have an action; for, where a statute gives a right, there, although in express terms it has not given a remedy, the remedy which by law is properly applicable to that right follows a…
discussed
Cited "see"
Roger Rankin Enterprises, Inc. v. Green
See Girard Trust Co. v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010 , 117 So. 786 (1928); Piezo Technology v. Smith, 413 So.2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) [1] ; Zorick v. Tynes, 372 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shiver v. Apalachee Publishing Co.
See, Girard Trust Company v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010 , 117 So. 786 (1928); Piezo Technology v. Smith, 413 So.2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Brooks v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, 399 So.2d 1, 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (Judge Glickstein dissenting); Zorick v. Tynes, 372 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Piezo Technology v. Smith
See Girard Trust Company v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010 , 117 So. 786 (1928).
discussed
Cited "see"
Webb v. Hill
See Girard Trust Co. v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010 , 117 So. 786 ." The section in question does not prohibit the doing of any work not set forth in the first budget or preliminary budget.
cited
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Booth
See Girard Trust Co. v. Tampashores Development Co., 95 Fla. 1010 , 117 So. 786 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buell v. Direct General Insurance Agency, Inc.
See Ford Motor Co. v. Mathis, 322 F.2d 267, 270 (5th Cir.1963) (emphasizing again that in a diversity-Nne action, court is bound by the applicable state law as the court divines it today); see also Newell v. Harold Shaffer Leasing Co., 489 F.2d 103, 107 (5th Cir.1974) (observing that “[sjtare decisis requires that we follow our own earlier determination as to the law of a state in the absence of any subsequent change in the state law.") (emphasis added). 7 *1217 In Davis, which was decided in 1986, the Eleventh Circuit determined that “[u]nder Florida law, when a statute creates a duty for…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
H. H. Hipson, Appellant,
v.
J. E. Taylor, Et Al., Appellees
v.
J. E. Taylor, Et Al., Appellees
Edwin Brobston, for Appellant;
T. H. Getzen, for Appellees.
Whitfield, Bueord.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.-
The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and we think Chapter 12252, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1927, the same being a validating Act was ample to cure any of the alleged irregularities or illegalities[*110] in the bonds brought in question or in the proceedings leading up to their issue.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and- Bueord, J. J., concur.