Cone Et Ux. v. Armstrong, 136 So. 688 (Fla. 1931). · Go Syfert
Cone Et Ux. v. Armstrong, 136 So. 688 (Fla. 1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. L. Cone, and Vera Graham Cone, His Wife
v.
C. G. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 8, 1931.
136 So. 688
Allen Dixon, for Appellants; Whitaker, Himes Whitaker, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. —.
Published

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P.J., AND TERRELL AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.