green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1907 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1907
1966
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Bishop, Et Vir v. First Old State Bank
See Simms v. Patterson, 53 Fla. 984 , 43 So. 421 ; Hogeboom v. Anderson, 70 Fla. 393 , 70 So. 312 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Ground Education Fund, Inc. v. Secretary, Florida Department of State
For this reason, our court early on has characterized “[t]he granting of a temporary injunction [a]s a matter peculiarly within the discretion of the court upon a consideration of all the circumstances.” Id.; see also Simms v. Patterson, 43 So. 421 , 422 (Fla. 1907) (“It is settled law in this court that both the granting and continuing of injunctions rests largely within the sound judicial CASE NO.: SC2026-0857 Page Five discretion of the [trial] court, to be governed by the circumstances of the case, and that an appellate court will not interfere with the exercise of this judicial disc…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
FAVROT
v.
FAVROT
No. 16,518.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 1, 1907.
Walter Guión, Atty. Gen., and Hubert Nicholls Wax, Dist. Atty. (Lewis Guión, of counsel), for the State. Thomas Jones Hernán and Laycoek & Beale, for appellee.
Monroe.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
MONROE, J.
The questions here presented have been fully considered in the case of State v. McClendon (this day decided) 43 South. 417[1] ; and, for the reasons assigned in that case, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.
1
Ante, p. 792.