Tampa Bay Apt. Hotel Co. v. Monrose, 75 So. 30 (Fla. 1917). · Go Syfert
Tampa Bay Apt. Hotel Co. v. Monrose, 75 So. 30 (Fla. 1917). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
76 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Spector v. Spector (fladistctapp, 2017-05-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1919 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1919 1972 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Spector v. Spector
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
The exception relating to alimony creditors is founded upon our supreme court’s conclusion more than one hundred years ago that the homestead protections “should not be so applied as to make it an instrument of fraud or imposition upon creditors.” Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30, 32 (1917) (citations omitted).
examined Cited as authority (rule) In re Cole (3×)
Bankr. M.D. Fla. · 2016 · confidence medium
Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30, 33 (1917); First Nat'l Bank of Chipley v. Peel, 107 Fla. 413 , 145 So. 177, 178 (1932). . 75 So. at 31 . .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Venn v. Reinhard (In Re Reinhard)
Bankr. N.D. Fla. · 2007 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. *319 Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30, 33 (1917) (stating that “[t]he Constitution does not contemplate that the exemptions allowed shall extend to any title, right, or interest in property that is not owned by the head of a family residing in this state.... [T]he right of exemption is no greater than his title and interest in the property”).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Dwight H. Owen, Debtor. Dwight H. Owen v. Helen Owen
11th Cir. · 1992 · confidence medium
Co. v. LaGasse, 223 So.2d 727, 728 (Fla.1969); Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819, 824-825 , 75 So. 30, 32-33 (1917); Volpitta v. Fields, 369 So.2d 367, 369 (Fla.App.1979).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Owen v. Owen (In re Owen)
11th Cir. · 1992 · confidence medium
Co. v. LaGasse, 223 So.2d 727, 728 (Fla.1969); Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819, 824-825 , 75 So. 30, 32-33 (1917); Volpitta v. Fields, 369 So.2d 367, 369 (Fla.App.1979).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Master Lock Credit Union v. Rayford
Wis. Ct. App. · 1984 · confidence medium
The purpose of the organic provisions is to secure homestead exemptions where *304 they properly attach under the law and not to deprive lienholders of their vested rights in property to which the homestead exemptions may afterwards be extended.” Id. at 604 , 282 N.W. at 7 , quoting Pasco v. Harley, 75 So. 30, 34 (Fla. 1917).
cited Cited "see" Quigley v. Kennedy & Ely Insurance, Inc.
Fla. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 .
cited Cited "see" Graham v. Azar
Fla. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 (1917).
cited Cited "see" Quigley v. Kennedy & Ely Insurance
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 (1917); Hillsborough Inv.
cited Cited "see" Howard v. Calhoun
Fla. · 1945 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pelecanos v. City of Hallandale Beach
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Milton v. Milton, 63 Fla. 533 , 58 So. 718 , 719 (1912), disapproved on other grounds, Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 (1917).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Levy v. Kozyak
11th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Milton v. Milton, 63 Fla. 533 , 58 So. 718 , 719 (Fla.1912) (overruled in part by Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 (Fla.1917)).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Levy v. Kozyak (In Re Financial Federated Title & Trust, Inc.)
11th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Milton v. Milton, 63 Fla. 533 , 58 So. 718 , 719 (Fla.1912) (overruled in part by Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 (Fla.1917)).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kozyack v. Levy (In Re Financial Federated Title & Trust, Inc.)
Bankr. S.D. Florida · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Milton v. Milton, 63 Fla. 533 , 58 So. 718 , 719 (Fla.1912) (overruled in part by Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 (Fla.1917)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Aetna Insurance Company v. LaGasse
Fla. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 ; First Nat'l Bank of Chipley v. Peel, 107 Fla. 413 , 145 So. 177 ; Giddens v. McFarlan, 152 Fla. 281 , 10 So.2d 807 ; Abernathy v. Gruppo, Fla.App. 1960, 119 So.2d 398 . [5] Anemaet v. Martin-Senour Company, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 23 . [6] Sec. 55.10, F.S., 1963, F.S.A. [7] Note 4, supra. [8] Quigley v. Kennedy & Ely Ins., Inc., Fla. 1968, 207 So.2d 431, 433 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Doing v. Riley
5th Cir. · 1949 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pasco v. Hartley, 73 Fla. 819 , 75 So. 30 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tampa Bay Apartment Hotel Company, a corporation, in Error
v.
E. W. Monrose, in Error
Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 19, 1917.
75 So. 30
Sparkman & Carter, for Plaintiff in Error;, Knight, Thompson & Turner, for Defendant in Error.
Published
Per Curiam.

The declaration herein is as follows: “E. W. Monr-ose, the plaintiff in the above entitled cause, by his undersigned attorneys, sues Tampa Bay Apartment Hotel Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, the defendant, for that heretofore on June 14th, 1912, the defendant became and was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars.

“1st. For money payable by the defendant to the plaintiff for work done and materials furnished by plaintiff for the defendant at its request:

“2nd. Money lent by the plaintiff to the defendant.

[*895] “3rd. And money paid by the plaintiff for the defendant at its request.

“Plaintiff avers that neither said sum of money nor any part thereon has been paid, but that the same remains wholly due, owing and unpaid from the defendant to the plaintiff.

“Wherefore, plaintiff sues apd claims Three Thousand Dollars, damages.” t

The defendant pleaded “that it never was indebted as alleged.” There was verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant took writ of error.

There is ample evidence to afford a legal basis for the verdict found for the plaintiff ón the issues as made, and as the evidence does- not so- preponderate against the verdict as to show the. jury, were not governed by the evidence, and no material error of law or procedure appearing, the verdict • will not be disturbed by the appellate court.

Judgment affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and .Taylor, Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis concur.