green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
1000 BRICKELL, LTD., etc. v. CITY OF MIAMI
Co., 14 So. 2d 172, 175 (Fla. 1943) (holding: “The courts of Florida have defined a common law dedication as a setting apart of land for public use, and to constitute such a dedication there must be an intention by the owner clearly indicated by his words or act to dedicate the land to the public use”).
cited
Cited "see"
MCCORMICK PROPERTIES OF MIAMI, LLC v. SOMI HOMES, LLC
See City of Miami Beach v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 14 So. 2d 172, 175 (Fla. 1943).
cited
Cited "see"
Brevard County v. Blasky
See City of Miami Beach v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 153 Fla. 107 , 14 So.2d 172, 175 (1943).
cited
Cited "see"
Star Island Assoc. v. City of St. Petersburg Beach
See City of Miami Beach v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 153 Fla. 107 , 14 So.2d 172 (1943); City of Palmetto v. Katsch, 86 Fla. 506 , 98 So. 352 (1923).
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Miami Beach Improvement Co.
(2×)
See City of Miami Beach et al. v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 153 Fla. 107 , 14 So.2d 172 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Miami Beach Improvement Co. v. City of Miami Beach
See City of Miami Beach v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 153 Fla. 107 , 14 So.2d 172 ; City of Miami Beach v. Wofford, 157 Fla. 13 , 25 So.2d 5 . (5) The order discharging the rule to show cause challenged on this appeal is reversed with directions for further proceedings in the court below not inconsistent with the views herein expressed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Paper Company, a Corporation
v.
Christopher Columbus Brown.
v.
Christopher Columbus Brown.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 11, 1943.
Thomas Sale, for appellant.
William K. Whitfield and J. Lewis Hall, for appellee.
Buford, Terrell, Chapman, Adams.
Published
PER CURIAM:
From an examination of the entire record we find no reversible error and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.