Kichinko v. Scarborough, 20 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1944). · Go Syfert
Search
Kichinko v. Scarborough, 20 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McDowell v. State (fla, 1948-06-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" McDowell v. State
Fla. · 1948 · signal: see · confidence high
See Campbell v. State, 155 Fla. 359 , 20 So. (2nd) 127 ; Haynes v. State, 147 Fla. 713 , 3 So. (2nd) 385 ; Fitch v. State, 135 Fla. 361 , 185 So. 435 , 125 A.L.R. 360 ; Bussart v. State, 128 Fla. 891 , 176 So. 32 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul Kichinko
v.
E. W. Scarborough, as Director of the State Beverage Department.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 19, 1944.
20 So. 2d 127
Hoffman Durant and J. Lewis Hall, for relator. J. Turner Butler, for respondent.
Buford, Terrell, Brown, Chapman, Thomas, Adams, Sebring.
Published
[*359] PER CURIAM:

The record and the briefs in this cause have been.examined and the peremptory writ of mandamus is awarded on authority of Singer, et al., v. Scarborough, decided this date, a like question being involved in both cases.

It is so ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.